Laserfiche WebLink
PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OVERVIEW <br />by transportation, land use, amenities and finance categories. <br />Comments in BOLD resonated with the group as critical elements. <br />Transportation: <br />» Reconstruction o fthe ioi/i6g interchange as a comprehensive project will likely not happen <br />within our planning horizon (zo-3o years) due to funding realities. Alternatively, "band-aid" <br />transportation improvements necessitated by tra f fic and sa fety problems will be the <br />norm. <br />» New Highway io interchange accessing the site is possible and would be looked at favorably by <br />MN/DOT in order to clean up sa fety and tra ffic problems caused by current intersections. An <br />interchange could happen independently o f other highway improvements. <br />» MN/DOT will likely close additional median crossings accessing the study area f rom Highway io <br />in the next several years to improve sa fety. It will likely limit those access points to to right-in/ <br />right-out only. <br />» Northstar rail is expected to open in November zoog. The Elk River train station is projected to <br />have goo riders/day. Northstar in formation is at www.mn-GetOnBoard.com <br />» Northstar Rail is planning one morning and one evening reverse-commute train per weekday. <br />Ridership demand may pressure more. <br />» Studies suggest that'/< o f employees/residents in the walking zone o f an LRT station will use <br />transit. Commuter rail capture rates will be less than LRT. <br />» When choosing whereto live, many people "drive" to the point they can a f ford. <br />» There is some talk o f legislatively limiting or surcharging "vehicle miles traveled". This could <br />create a market incentive for transit-oriented, compact development. <br />Land Use: <br />» Early in its evolution, the commuter rail station will have only a minor impact on large <br />scale retail development in the study area but will drive relatively small amounts o f <br />convenience retail near the station. The commuter rail station is seen as a plus for <br />office, industrial and residential uses. <br />» Highway and train noise is a big issue for residential development - a land use bu f fer <br />is needed between corridors and housing. <br />» Housing demand is built on job creation. Job creation in the study area should be key f ocus. The <br />commuter train could be an o f fice/industrial marketing bonus for the study area. <br />» FHA financing o f residential development is dependent on noise levels. <br />» Job-based commercial development market is currently declining. <br />» Development objectives outlined in the three alternatives could not be realized <br />without Highway to interchange. <br />1' <br />z ,: <br />_. <br />;~ <br />'17130. W2f1l.1@ Focused Area STudy ~1 <br />