My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
4.2. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:59:30 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:45:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical 13~~lletin 1Voo ~~-~~ ;(23 <br />~aEy 2®~? <br />SelectinS an Appropriate (3vercoat System <br />Adding additional coats of paint to an old paint system will always increase the degree of cohesive stress. The risk <br />factor question is usual{y not if the new system will adhere to the properly prepared surface of the old, it's whether <br />or not the old system has good enough film integrity, adhesion between coats and to the substrate to support an <br />overcoat system without literally falling apart. <br />Before selecting candidate overcoat system(s) one must keep in mind that cohesive stress exerted on the existing <br />system will vary with generic type. Non-flexible conventional 2-component epoxies like Series 27, aliphatic <br />urethanes like Series 1075 and moisture cured urethanes like Series 530 will develop more cohesive stress upon <br />curing than more flexible coatings such as acrylic emulsions (Series 30), medium to long oil alkyds (Series 23) and <br />epoxy mastics (Series 135). One must also keep in mind That wgardless of generic type overcoat system, the higher <br />the film thickness the greater the cohesive stress on the existing system. For example, application of a Series <br />N69/Series 1075 system at i2.0 mils tots! DFT to an old paint system possessing marginal adhesion, would most <br />likely lead to a delamination disaster. Enough cohesive stress will be developed that the old system will be literally <br />pulled apart at its weakest adhesion link (between coats or from the substrate). <br />Geographic location {exposure conditions} also plays a role in the selection of an appropriate overcoat system. <br />Paint systems in the northe--n states undergo more stress because of freeze/thaw cycling. Flexible, low cohesive <br />stress overcoat systems, therefore, become even mere important in those areas of the country that are subject to <br />frequent freeze/thaw cycles during winter months. <br />Delamination Risk Factor: As mentioned earlier, it is important to check adhesion of the existing paint system <br />before deciding whether or not it is a candidate for overcoating. After testing adhesion in accordance with ASTM <br />D 3359 Method A, a delamination risk factor can be assigned on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 the lowest delamination <br />risk after overcoating and 5 the highest. See Table I, page 5. <br />Worse case scenarios are multi-coat, high film thickness, existing coating systems with poor adhesion between <br />coats or to the substrate in a freeze./thaw locale. A Tnemec overcoat system should not be suggested if a worse case <br />scenario exists. <br />Old paint systems with high delamination risk factors (4.5 to 5) are usually not candidates for overcoating. `vVhen <br />in doubt check with Tnemec's Technical Services Department. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.