Laserfiche WebLink
4-L <br />Elk River .~ . <br />Municipal Utilities <br />Memorandum <br />To: Elk River Utilities Commission <br />Jd~n Diesri <br />Jen'y ~' <br />D~y1'll~a~~pem <br />From: David Berg <br />Date: 5/5/2009 <br />Subject: Jackson Street Water Tower <br />The Jackson Street Water Tower was also inspected by one of the major tower paint supply <br />companies, TNEMEC Coating Resources Inc. Their review consisted of a site visit, "x" <br />scratch test, and laboratory testing. Attached is the detailed report they provided. The main <br />conclusion in their report is as follows: <br />"Based on the age and the excessive film build of the existing coatings, an over-coat <br />of this tank would be a very risky application. Additionally, results of the X-scribes I <br />performed indicate moderate to poor adhesion. In our freeze/thaw climate, the addition of <br />more coatings and curing stresses will greatly increase the likelihood of a coatings <br />failure/delam ination." <br />We received the Jackson Street Water Tower lead sample test results from the State of MN <br />Public Health Lab. The tank showed to have 0.026% of lead contaminant in the paint on the <br />bowl. Whereas, the tank legs contain 1.5% lead contaminants. Under MPCA jurisdiction the <br />max lead rule is 0.5% total lead by weight. The tank legs exceed this regulated amount. The <br />risk of airborne lead drift would be a problem, especially being so close to residents & <br />schools. We would need to be sure that preventative actions are taken with either <br />demolishing/refurbishing the tower. <br />Based on the above information, I received two quotes for $190,000 to $300,000 to re- <br />condition the tank with the current lead contaminants. Since there are too many unknowns for <br />this project this value can vary greatly. If there are more underlying problems it could be <br />closer to $300,000 to be sure the structure (ladder, roof, rail, etc...) is OSHA approved. <br />