My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. ERMUSR AGENDA 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
2. ERMUSR AGENDA 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2013 11:37:34 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:30:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUAG
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
burden falling disproportionately on the smallest issuers. MIPF also predicts a reduced demand for these <br />bonds. The bottom line, argues MIPF, is minimal additional revenue to the state and significantly <br />increased borrowing costs for local government. <br />A number of other provisions are also of concern, including a House provision that would complicate the <br />sales tax exemption for energy used for heating purposes, and a Senate provision that would increase <br />utility property taxes. This would directly affect certain power agency property and indirectly affect <br />others through what would likely be increased pass-through costs. <br />Senate tax bill conferees are Bakk, Skoe, Dibble, Moua, Johnson. House conferees are Lenczewski, <br />Marquart, Koenen, Loeffler, Seifert. <br />Capitol observers report the Governor is likely to veto any bill coming out of the conference committee <br />with obvious tax increases. The House and Senate bills both have obvious tax increases. The Governor <br />has the votes in the House Republican caucus to sustain his veto. Some are predicting a long special <br />session. The government shut-down date is July 1. <br />The House and Senate have each completed their budget bills for environmental agencies and, city <br />interests favor the Senate proposal. Both bills, however, continue the trend of increased fees. <br />The House bill, HF 2123, includes collection of $1.7 million of environmental review costs on water- <br />related projects and $2.2 million of water and wastewater training and certification costs collected by <br />the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for the upcoming biennium. <br />The bill, according to the League of Minnesota Cities, requires that the rest of the agency's water <br />permitting program, excluding compliance and enforcement activities, be funded through fee increases <br />enacted in January 2011, which will amount to an additional $3.6 million per biennium. The bill also <br />includes early adoption of a $6 million per biennium water permit fee increase and the early adoption of <br />current draft permit fee increases so that those fees will go into effect as of July 1 instead of later this <br />year. <br />The Senate budget bill SF 2099) does not include any of the fee increases found in the House bill. The <br />Senate bill does, however, increase the summer surcharge for water appropriations from $20 per million <br />gallons to $30 per million gallons. <br />Both bills call for adding $1,500 to water crossing fees charged for crossing state property and $4,500 to <br />land crossing fees. (Both fees are currently set at $500.) The increased fees would raise approximately <br />$550,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.