Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota's municipal utilities <br />support enemy conservation. The <br />wise use of energy is in keeping with <br />the main goal of our electric and gas <br />services - to provide good service at a <br />reasonable price. Helping customers <br />improve their efficiency helps the <br />environment, helps the utility defer <br />the need to invest in generating <br />facilities and helps consumers manage <br />their energy bills. <br />Municipal utilities'support for energy <br />conservation has been demonstrated <br />by their continuing efforts to meet <br />state energy conservation mandates. <br />Municipal utilities were early leaders <br />in developing programs to manage <br />and control customers' peak. Many <br />municipal utilities have been <br />operating energy efficiency programs <br />for 20 years or more. Many others <br />have become increasingly engaged <br />in developing and implementing <br />conservation programs. <br />In 2007, the Minnesota legislature <br />passed a statewide CIP goal of 1.596 <br />annual conservation savings for <br />electric and natural gas utilities. Some <br />suggest an even higher goal should be <br />established. However, the 1.596 target <br />is generally considered to be a difficult <br />goal, and we believe that utilities and <br />the Department of Commerce (DOC) <br />should be allowed to ramp up to the <br />2010 target date before the Legislature <br />considers any additional changes. <br />Minnesota municipal utilities <br />currently spend about x12 million <br />per year on conservation programs. <br />After operating active conservation <br /> <br />programs for many years, some <br />utilities have picked all the low- <br />hanging fruit and are finding it more <br />difficult to maintain cost-effective <br />conservation programs. Minnesota's <br />municipal utilities are serious about <br />conservation, but we are also serious <br />about spending our ratepayers' dollars <br />wisely and about not raising rates to <br />pay for unproven or highly speculative <br />conservation programs. We believe <br />that the legislature should take a <br />cautious approach toward any further <br />conservation spending mandates. <br />Minnesota's policy regarding CIP. <br />should adhere to the following . <br />principles: <br />No additional CIP requirements <br />should be imposed on municipal <br />electric or gas utilities until we <br />have had an opportunity to fully <br />implement and to gauge the im- <br />pact and effectiveness of the 2007 <br />legislation. <br />Ultimate- decision-making author- <br />ity regarding municipal utility CIP <br />energy efficiency and Ioad man <br />agement programs-must remain <br />with the local govierning'body of <br />the utility. . <br />Conservation Improvement Programs (CIP) <br />