My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 07-29-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
07/29/1996 - SPECIAL
>
5.1. SR 07-29-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:25 AM
Creation date
4/30/2003 2:10:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/29/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
trunk sewer and water project requires a city contribution. Through these <br />discussions, the city has reached an understanding for the best overall <br />conceptual layout for a trunk utility system to service this area. This best <br />overall general layout begins with the trunk sanitary sewer going "across" <br />Highway 169 rather than going "down" Highway 169. <br /> <br />It should be noted that obtaining easement for the trunk lines that go to east <br />Elk River could take anywhere from nine to twelve months. This could be <br />less if the city receives a petition for a small project, but could be the full 12 <br />months if the trunk pipes have to go across non-petitioning lands to reach a <br />petitioned area. As noted above, the city has a general idea of the best <br />location for these lines, but more work needs to be completed in order to put a <br />final trunk alignment plan in place. The city has recently received aerial <br />topography for this part of the city to help identify the best trunk alignment. <br />Directing the City Engineer to prepare a trunk alignment plan can take place <br />without a public improvement project being ordered. <br /> <br />If the City Council initiated a trunk utility project, it would require a 4/5 <br />Council majority vote. Ultimately, it may be in the best interest of the city <br />for any trunk project into eastern Elk River to be originated by a property <br />owner's request and petition. A valid petition for public improvements <br />requires a 3/2 Council majority vote to be approved. If a valid petition from a <br />landowner/developer is received and a project ordered by the Council, then <br />the city by 4/5 Council vote may consider expanding upon this petitioned <br />project in order to provide services to a larger area. <br /> <br />Attachments: <br /> <br />· Public Informational Meeting Notice <br />· Letter from Ronald Ebner <br />· East Elk River Urban Service District Map <br />· List of Notified Property Owners <br />· Sections of Patchin Appraisal Report <br /> <br />s:\council\agnm7-29.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.