Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minnesota Municipal Uti/ities Association <br />P'®ssti®n Statement <br />Federal Incentives for Renewables <br />0 <br />N <br />Ul <br />Two federal issues important to Minnesota municipal utilities should be addressed in any <br />energy legislation passed by Congress: <br />Tradable Tax Credit-Tax Credit Bonds. Minnesota municipal utilities have long <br />embraced the use of renewable generation to meet the electric energy needs of the citizens of <br />their communities. They have been motivated by the need to secure wholesale power that <br />will result in reliable and reasonably priced service to their customers while respecting the <br />concerns, including the social and environmental concerns, of the citizens who depend on <br />their service and ultimately control their operations. It was for that reason, more than 50 <br />years ago, that municipal utilities in western Minnesota began making commitments to <br />purchase wholesale power from federal hydroelectric dams at a time when coal power would <br />have been less expensive and, it seemed, possibly even more reliable. It is with this same <br />sense of responsibility that municipal utilities are approaching the effort to develop wind and <br />other renewables in order to meet a portion of their electricity needs. <br />Minnesota law requires that municipal power agencies, G&T cooperatives and IOUs make a <br />"good faith effort" to generate or procure 1% of the electricity needs of the retail customers in <br />their systems from "renewable" resources by 2005, and increase the amount by 1% each year, <br />to 10% by 2015. An added biomass mandate is included, requiring'/2% of electric sales to <br />come from biomass sources by 2010, and 1% by 2015. <br />Power from renewable resources and advanced technologies continues to be more expensive <br />than power from traditional generation sources. Federal investment incentives are needed to <br />encourage the construction of these facilities. The federal government has determined that <br />tax policy is a viable mechanism to encourage renewables and provides private developers <br />with the Production Tax Credit (PTC), a federal tax credit for electricity generated from <br />qualifying renewable energy projects. However, investment tax credits made available to <br />privately-owned utilities and energy production companies do not create incentives for <br />publicly-owned or rural electric cooperative utilities, which serve 25% of the nation's <br />electricity load. <br />To address this lack of equity, the Renewable Energy Production Incentive (KEPI) program <br />was developed. KEPI was intended to provide a comparable renewable incentive for public <br />power systems but it has been subject to sporadic lapses in reauthorization and has been <br />severely under-funded. This lack of certainty limits the incentives' effectiveness, and <br />ultimately, the amount of renewable generation developed. During the last three <br />Congressional sessions, community-owned utilities have supported legislation that would <br />provide community-owned utilities a "tradable tax credit" which would place them in an <br />equitable position with investor-owned utilities. Tradable tax credits would be an effective <br />way to help diversify the nation's fuel reserves by promoting the increased development of <br />efficient and clean energy resources -particularly in rural America. <br />Despite strong support from House and Senate members as well as from Senate Finance <br />Committee Chairman Grassley, the tradable tax credit concept was not able to move forward <br />