Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br />t3ills of interest to certain memisers <br />In the meantime, there are still a lot of bills of interest to MMUA members. <br />A number of these are items that didn't get taken care of last session, like I_1F 50 (SF 199) which <br />provides funding for renovation offlood-damaged Roseau municipal facilities, or HF 1.99_(SF 240) <br />which provides flood hazard mitigation grants for a number of MMUA member cities. <br />There is also a bill (HF_8, sponsored by Rukavina, DFL-Virginia) that pertains to the Hibbing- <br />Virginiabiomass project. The two cities have formed a joint venture-the Laurentian Energy <br />Authority-which is asking for $2.5 million to help build a wood waste processing facility. <br />The House Jobs and Economic Opportunity Policy and Finance Committee heard the proposal <br />Jan. 19. Hibbing Public Utilities General Manager Jim Kochevar, Virginia Public Utilities General <br />Manager Terry Leoni and Rep. Rukavina all testified for the measure. Rep. Tony Sertich (DFL- <br />Chisholm) made the motion to forward the bill for inclusion in the bonding resolution. It passed <br />unanimously. <br />Renewable energy incentives debated <br />The utility bill of most interest so far this young session has been HF__ 21.$ (Cornish, Smith, <br />Gunther), which was heard Tuesday in the House Regulated Industries Committee. This bill deals with <br />the Renewable Energy Production Incentive (KEPI). Under this statute, owners of wind energy <br />conversion systems with a capacity of 2 MW or less receive 1.5 cents for each kilowatt-hour (kWh) <br />produced for a period of 10 years. The incentive payment is available to only 200 MW of total capacity <br />statewide. Project owners apply to the Department of Commerce to qualify for the incentive. If they are <br />deemed eligible, the project must be operational within 18 months, or approval to receive the incentive <br />payment is withdrawn. Eligibility for all unbuilt projects will expire in May 2005. That stipulation is the <br />current problem. <br />Some proposed projects on "the list" have not become operational within 18 months. Those <br />waiting further down the queue, including Missouri River Energy Services and the Southern Minnesota <br />Municipal Power Agency, among others, want the process to work as the law decrees. But others want <br />more time. <br />The committee tabled the bill Tuesday. Rep. Bob Gunther (R-Fairmont) proposed a possible <br />compromise, the details of which need to be worked out. <br />Personal property tax exemption complicated? <br />Another bill on the MMUA tracking list if HF 41.3 _(Fritz, DFL- Faribault). This is a personal <br />property tax exemption for the Minnesota Municipal Power Agency gas-fired plant in Faribault. While <br />MMPA and local officials have seen eye to eye on this project, that is not the case everywhere. The <br />Goodhue County Board Jan. 4 denied a request for a tax exemption for agas-fired peaking plant near <br />Cannon Falls proposed by Chicago-based Invenergy. How this will affect the once perfunctory personal <br />property tax exemption at the Legislature remains to be seen. <br />Sewer, water locating rule progresses <br />Have you expressed your concern about the proposed rule that would require 'operators' <br />of water and sewer systems to locate service laterals located in the right-of-way? The hearing <br />before the Administrative Law Judge is Feb. 1. Speak now, or forever hold your peace. If you need <br />more info, contact MMUA. <br />1/31/05 <br />