Laserfiche WebLink
C.4PX 2020 <br />INTERIM REPORT <br />DECEMBER 2004 <br />RECENT TRENDS <br />According to the May 2002 National Transmission Grid Study by the U.S. Department of <br />Energy (DOE), investment in new transmission facilities declined steadily nationwide for the <br />previous 25 years while growth in demand and additions of new generation have continued. <br />Further, the DOE study states that this disparity between the demand for electricity and the <br />capacity to transport it shows no sign of abating. According to the DOE study, "Construction <br />ofhigh-voltage transmission facilities is expected to increase by only 6 percent (in line miles) <br />during the next 10 years, in contrast to the expected 20 percent increase in electricity demand <br />and generating capacity." <br />Minnesota and the surrounding region are not exceptions to this trend. Since 1980, demand <br />for electricity in Minnesota has grown steadily at a rate of 2.64 percent annually. While the <br />current grid has accommodated this growth and generally is adequate to meet today's needs, <br />this increase in volume has used most of the system's spare capacity. Utilities have made <br />modest system improvements and investments to meet basic load serving and reliability <br />requirements and optimize the transmission capacity, but they have not been inclined to <br />undertake major transmission construction projects. <br />CURRENT UTILITY PLANNING PROCESS <br />Today, regional transmission planning is coordinated by the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool <br />(MAPP), a voluntary association of electric utilities and other electric industry participants, <br />and the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator Inc. (MISO), a regional <br />transmission organization with functional control over all high-voltage transmission <br />facilities. While MAPP and MISO provide overarching regional processes for transmission <br />planning, plans still begin with the individual electric utilities that own and/or operate <br />transmission facilities. <br />Each utility employs transmission planners whose principal responsibility is to ensure the <br />safety and reliability of the transmission system for the benefit of all customers. The <br />planners prepare detailed studies, first assessing present and projected electricity demand and <br />then identifying areas on the transmission system that are increasingly inadequate to serve <br />current and future customers. The planning horizon is generally 10 years. <br />Individual utilities submit their plans to MAPP sub-regional planning groups (SPGs), made <br />up of transmission planners from MAPP member utilities and other stakeholders, including <br />state regulatory agencies and environmental advocacy groups. The SPG process allows <br />utilities to coordinate their plans and collaborate on how best to serve the region. The <br />process considers transmission expansion alternatives, new generation facilities that may be <br />planned for the region, and how additions to the regional transmission system may impact <br />neighboring regions. <br />SPGs invite public participation into the process, explain their findings to the public and <br />consider the public's input into the plan and the best route for the proposed transmission <br />lines. The results are sub-regional plans that are "rolled up" into a MAPP regional plan and <br />incorporated into MISO's overall regional and interregional plans. <br />