Laserfiche WebLink
is hopefully going to be an example of joint planning for a city's benefit, where the city <br />would eventually have the option of ownership in the upgrades. <br />Third, CMMPA has been working with Paul Reising and Bob Jablon to resolve with Xcel <br />the termination of its black box settlement. This settlement was terminated by Xcel on <br />Mar 31 of this year. The settlement included significant transmission credits, and <br />CMMPA is now negotiating for a reinstatement of some portion of the credits. <br />CAPX 2020-the "faith-based organization" continues. CAPX has sent out a significant <br />press release today (June 9) about the first transmission project it plans to construct -the <br />"Brookings to Twin Cities" project. This is a 345 kV line estimated to be in service 2012, <br />and MMTG will be one of the investors. It represents a significant investment for us - <br />roughly $26 million, with a MISO approved Return on Equity of 12.38%. There is a lot <br />of discussion among the CAPX members about how the underlying agreements for <br />ownership and cost recovery will work. CAPX has recently engaged the law firm of <br />Fulbright and Jaworski to work with all CAPX members. MMTG will be using Kaela <br />Brennan from McGrann Shea as our legal contact point for CAPX. CAPX expects to <br />have a Memorandum of Understanding in place that has been signed by all participants <br />within the next two-three months. It hopes to have project agreements signed by the end <br />of 2006. As CAPX struggles through the significant questions of how exactly it will work <br />together, so we MMTG members must also figure out how our investments will work in <br />CAPX. It is possible (even likely) that we will have opportunities for investments beyond <br />our load ratio share. <br />Alliant and ATC: After Alliant failed to develop legislation to satisfy Iowa Utilities <br />Board concerns over jurisdiction over ATC facilities, progress seems to have stalled <br />between ALT and ATC. <br />The Organization of MISO States meeting at the Iowa Utilities Board: <br />This is a parallel concern for MMTG. The MISO OMS represents regulators from all the <br />states in which MISO operates. The OMS recently filed comments to FERC giving its <br />opinion on long term transmission rights, and frankly the comments were not friendly to <br />load serving entities like municipal utilities, who need long term transmission rights to <br />parallel their investment in baseload and renewable generation. Without these rights, <br />municipal utilities could face huge price risk getting their generation delivered. Anyway, <br />the chairman of the IUB, John Norris, has initiated an advisory group of Iowa utilities to <br />advise the Iowa representatives to the OMS about Iowa concerns with MISO. The first <br />meeting was held June 2 in Des Moines. While it was mainly a set of presentations from <br />MISO and IUB staff, it does hold promise for a better discussion about our MISO <br />cost/benefit concerns and protection of our consumers. We took advantage of John <br />Norris' offer to send him written comments and we did so, taking exception to the OMS <br />comments on long-term rights. <br />Please contact me with any questions or concerns: akimber e,iamu.org or 515 289-5213 <br />