Laserfiche WebLink
of them would probably be happy to keep the system but contract out the <br />management and operation. <br />• Many small systems (Lanesboro is an example) don't have much in the way of <br />customer programs, and suffer in comparison to the local IOU or co-op. A <br />contract service that provided and administered customer programs would help <br />maintain customer satisfaction with the municipal utility. <br />• We have a number of areas in the state in which there are a lot of small <br />municipals that could easily be operated or managed jointly. The Iron Range, the <br />area south and east of Rochester, and the area around New Ulm and Fairfax are <br />examples. An experienced and capable manager could oversee the operations of <br />several systems, improving their performance and likely saving the utility money <br />at the same time. <br />• A similar program could be established for line crews, which is essentially what <br />MRES is doing for some of its members. An appropriately-sized crew could <br />support several local utilities, improving efficiency and perhaps lowering costs <br />overall. <br />Is it time for MMUA to take a serious look at offering contract management and/or <br />operations services? <br />Gas Agency <br />One of the issues that surfaced during our involvement in the Aquila gas system sale over <br />the past year is the potential benefits of establishing a municipal gas agency in <br />Minnesota. There are a number of services that a gas agency could provide, including: <br />• Provide technical and operations assistance to small gas systems. <br />• Provide contract management and operations services to systems that would like <br />to essentially turn the operations over to someone else. <br />• Provide an existing system that cities considering the development of a municipal <br />gas utility could tap into. (A few years ago, Thief River Falls decided not to <br />exercise abuy-out window in their gas franchise, because they didn't want to take <br />that task on without a support system. Their decision might have been different if <br />there had been an operating gas agency.) <br />• Provide schedule and balancing services for small gas systems. <br />• Provide a mechanism for joint purchase of gas supplies. <br />o Joint purchase should offer benefits due to larger volumes as well as <br />geographic and climate diversity. <br />o The agency could also purchase gas for agencies or municipal utilities that <br />need gas for electric generation. Adding summer generation load to <br />winter heating load would improve the collective load factor and benefit <br />all participants. <br />Under this scenario gas systems would be able to choose the level of service that they <br />want. Our gas circuit rider program might also be transferred over to the agency. <br />9 <br />