Laserfiche WebLink
executives are going to make abillion-dollar bet <br />on it," says William Rosenberg of Harvard's <br />Kennedy School of Government. The two gasifi- <br />cation power plants in the U.S. are half the size <br />of most commercial generating stations and have <br />proved less reliable than traditional plants. The <br />technology also costs as much as 20 percent more. <br />Most important, there's little incentive fora com- <br />pany to take on the extra risk and expense of <br />cleaner technology: For now U.S. utilities are free <br />to emit as much carbon dioxide as they like. <br />Cinergy CEO James Rogers, the man in charge <br />of Gibson and eight other carbon-spewing <br />plants, says he expects that to change. "I do <br />believe we'll have regulation of carbon in this <br />country," he says, and he wants his company to <br />be ready. "The sooner we get to work, the bet- <br />ter. Ibelieve it's very important that we develop <br />the ability to do carbon sequestration:' Rogers <br />says he intends to build acommercial-scale <br />gasification power plant, able to capture its car- <br />bon dioxide, and several other companies have <br />announced similar plans. <br />The energy bill passed last July by the U.S. <br />Congress offers help in the form of loan guar- <br />antees and tax credits for gasification projects. <br />"This should jump-start things," says Rosenberg, <br />MITCH EPSTEIN <br />A CLEANER WAY I A North Dakota chemical <br />plant transforms coal to a gas while stripping <br />out carbon dioxide and piping it underground <br />to an oil field in Canada; only steam escapes. <br />This plant sells the gas, but clean power plants <br />of the future could make coal gas, then burn <br />it to generate electricity. <br />who advocated these measures in testimony to <br />Congress. The experience of building and run- <br />ning the first few plants should lower costs and <br />improve reliability. And sooner or later, says <br />Rogers, new environmental laws that put a price <br />on carbon dioxide emissions will make clean tech- <br />nology look far more attractive. "If the cost of <br />carbon is 30 bucks a ton, it's amazing the kinds <br />of technologies that will evolve to allow you to <br />produce more electricity with less emissions:' <br />If he's right, we may one day be able to cool <br />our houses without turning up the thermostat <br />on the entire planet. ^ <br />R Insatiable Appetite Can the Earth sustain our <br />growing coal consumption? Is the government push- <br />ing hard enough for cleaner coal technologies? <br />Share your thoughts in our forum at ngm.com/0603. <br />THE HIGH COST OP CHEAP COAL 103 <br />