Laserfiche WebLink
AwAii.~~ <br />Minnesota Municipal Uti/ities Association <br />Position Statement <br />Protecting the Interests of WAPA Customers <br />The Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) is one of four federal power marketing <br />administrations (PMAs). WAPA markets and delivers reliable, cost-based hydroelectric <br />power within a 15 state region of the central and western United States. WAPA is very <br />important to Minnesota municipal utilities, providing wholesale power allocations to 47 <br />municipal electric utilities serving over 200,000 people in the western third of the state. <br />WAPA's 17,000-mile transmission system carries electricity from 55 hydropower plants <br />operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the <br />International Boundary and Water Commission. <br />In marketing electricity, WAPA must follow many laws, regulations and policies, some <br />of which are unique to that agency. Included in these laws is the Reclamation Project Act <br />of 1939, which requires WAPA to give preference in selling federal power to certain <br />types ofnon-profit organizations including cities, rural electric cooperatives, state and <br />federal agencies, irrigation districts, public utility districts and Native American tribes. <br />WAPA customers in Minnesota are served by the Upper Great Plains Region office <br />located in Billings, Montana, which, in turn, provides electric service from the seven <br />dams of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Program, developed as a result of Congressional <br />~, <br />N <br />W <br />O <br />0 <br />0 <br />N <br />N <br />O <br />3 <br />Z <br />T <br />N <br />X <br />V <br />W <br />U1 <br />Ul <br />1-+ <br />0 <br />.~ <br />3 <br />3 <br />c <br />a <br />0 <br />authorization in 1944. <br />The Office of Management and Budget is currently recycling an earlier proposal to <br />reallocate $365 million in costs for authorized but undeveloped irrigation projects for <br />payment by Pick-Sloan customers. We strongly object to this approach by OMB, since <br />those projects could be authorized by the federal government at any time. Even if the <br />irrigation projects are not developed, power customers should not be singled out to bear <br />the entire burden for those costs. <br />Other key issues include: <br />• The current short-term authorization for the Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of <br />Reclamation to use PMA customer receipts to fund the operation and maintenance <br />of hydro projects should be made permanent. <br />• Use of PMA customer receipts to fund hydro project operation and maintenance <br />should occur only after review and approval by PMA customers. <br />• PMA security costs should be paid by the general budget of the Bureau, and not <br />borne by the PMAs and their customers. <br />• The appropriations process must provide adequate funding for purchased power <br />and wheeling programs. <br />