Laserfiche WebLink
~A~~~.~~ <br />~,,,,~/ <br />Minnesota Municipal Uti/ities Association <br />Position statement <br />Transmission and RTOs <br />The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), while far from perfect, was a step in the <br />right direction in several areas, and was supported by public power due to the addition of <br />several key provisions: <br />• Mandatory, enforceable reliability standards; <br />• Federal backstop authority for transmission siting; <br />• New authority by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to prevent <br />market manipulation; and <br />• Preserving long-term transmission rights for load-serving entities. <br />Despite the best efforts of Congress and FERC to develop efficient wholesale markets, <br />public power communities are finding it more difficult than ever to secure reliable and <br />reasonably priced wholesale power as a result of FERC decisions concerning the <br />governance of the transmission network. Public power entities have encountered serious <br />problems in dealing with the regional transmission organizations (RTOs) designated by <br />FERC to manage the regional transmission grid. <br />In order to continue to provide their electric customers with reliable power at reasonable <br />rates, Minnesota municipal electric utilities will need FERC to play a more proactive role <br />to ensure the construction of adequate transmission facilities, workable transmission <br />policies, and adequate implementation of new rules promulgated as a result of EPAct <br />2005. <br />Specifically, several key issues worth watching include: <br />RTO Accountability. RTOs were originally formed with the idea of benefiting <br />consumers by adopting policies promoting non-discriminatory transmission <br />service, regional long-term planning and timely investments in transmission <br />facilities. Instead, they have increasingly resorted to questionable pricing <br />practices to deal with transmission congestion rather than adopting policies <br />designed to lower costs and to improve service. At the same time, there is a <br />growing concern that RTOs are resisting any questioning of the economic theories <br />underpinning these actions. Other problems with the RTOs include: spiraling <br />RTO costs, unaccountable governance, lack of understanding of end-user needs <br />and less than satisfactory service options. <br />Market Manipulation. Power supply markets have become more concentrated. <br />Merely requiring open access transmission has not made those markets workably <br />competitive. The repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) <br />could potentially increase the concentration of these markets. The use of <br />locational marginal pricing (LMP) allows certain stakeholders to benefit from <br />