My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ERMUSR Misc 05-10-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2007
>
05-10-2007
>
ERMUSR Misc 05-10-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2009 3:43:12 PM
Creation date
3/20/2009 3:43:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lizing local action. The effectiveness <br />of crisis conditions, court orders, US <br />Environmental Protection Agency <br />(USEPA) standards, and security con- <br />cerns are acknowledged as motivat- <br />ing factors. Although the value and <br />importance of water are acknowl- <br />edged as motivators, the need for a <br />long-term commitment to sustain- <br />ability as a focus of intergenerational <br />stewardship is regarded as a rough <br />sell in some communities. <br />Part of the solution to this prob- <br />lem involves framing the issue in a <br />way that is closer to reality. The issue <br />should be framed proactively in terms <br />of the need for a sustained ramping <br />up of expenditures rather than as an <br />expenditure gap, which frames the <br />issue as a crisis that requires sudden <br />outlays of cash. As confirmed by our <br />research, every city has a long queue <br />of crisis petitioners, and being rele- <br />gated to waiting in that line is not <br />FIGURE 2 Demographic waves and changing pipe materials (A) combine <br />with variable pipe life estimates to produce echo waves <br />of replacement needs IBI <br />A <br />a <br />c <br />0 <br />E <br />~, <br />I <br />N <br />0 <br />U <br />B <br />d <br />C <br />0 <br />.~ <br />I <br />N <br />0 <br />U <br />- .- r ~- r N <br />Year <br />Year <br />Source: Water Infrastructure at a Turning Point: The Road to Sustainable Asset <br />Management, AWWA, 2006. <br />AC-asbestos-cement, Conc-concrete, OJ-ductile iron, Pit Ct-pit cast iron, <br />PVC-polyvinyl chloride, Spun C!-spun cast iron <br />the desired outcome. Communities <br />cannot afford co have their utilities <br />backed into that corner. <br />By framing the issue in terms of <br />the need to ramp up, utilities are able <br />to draw a focus on asset manage- <br />ment as the best practice approach <br />to keeping the investment slope grad- <br />ual, thus avoiding rate shocks <br />(AWWA, 2004). Communities that <br />practice asset management are able to <br />mobilize around finding a sustain- <br />able path rather than seeking a lim- <br />ited crisis response. <br />ASSET LIFE LESSONS <br />Pipes generally constitute the <br />bulk of a utility's infrastructure and <br />have the longest useful lives. Con- <br />sequently, they are major drivers <br />in fundamentally altering invest- <br />ment needs for rehabilitation and <br />replacement and are the impetus <br />for ramping up expenditures. This <br />does not diminish the importance <br />of nonpipe assets, which also rep- <br />resent asignificant investment and <br />typically require much shorter <br />replacement cycles. <br />Pumps, treatment facilities, and <br />extensive instrumentation and con- <br />trol systems are also "invisible" to <br />the public. However, these compo- <br />nents have shorter life cycles and <br />require earlier replacements, creat- <br />ing aview of water-related infra- <br />structure that requires only periodic <br />injections of capital followed by <br />years of trouble-free operations. In <br />contrast, pipe rehabilitation and <br />replacement will require a sustained <br />flow of expenditures. <br />In simple terms, pipes are replaced <br />based on the date the pipe was <br />installed and the length of its life. <br />As in any population, age is not the <br />only determinant of the length of a <br />life. All the pipes that are "born" in <br />a given year will not "die" in the <br />same year in the future. For example, <br />pipes placed in corrosive soils or in <br />locations where they are subject to <br />adverse stresses have a decreased life <br />expectancy. The number of years of <br />service for a group of pipes installed <br />in the same year will take the form of <br />~, <br />~n ~n in N <br />O O O O O O O O O O <br />N N N N N N N N N N <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.