Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> to the bulk transmission grid is fair to all ~a~holesale market participant_ti. <br /> In initial comments on Lhe NOPR Filed in August 2006, APPA told FERC that discrete <br /> changes are needed to the OP:I"T, especially in the areas of transmission planning and joint <br /> transmission Facilities ownership, along with vigorous enforcement of the tariff's provisions. <br /> APPA said that afull-scale overhaul, however, is not neededIn September of 2006, APPA filed <br /> reply comments on the NOPR in which it urged the Commission to "not excuse RTOs from <br /> ih~e requirement to demonstrate that their non-OA'IT transmission regimes are consistent <br /> with or superior to OA'1 T ser~~ce," among other things. Finally, in llecember 2006, APP: <br /> filed supplemental comments on the issue of whether GATT transmission providers should <br /> be required to administer generation redispatcll markets. APPA argued that such markets <br />^~ <br />i would be complex, difficult for transmission providers owning generation to administer, and <br /> would not yield substantial improvements in OAT"T transmission service. FERC is expected to <br /> issue a final rule on OATT reform in the first part of 2007. <br /> <br /> PUHCA and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 <br /> EPAct05 repealed the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUI-ICr1). At the same <br /> time, Congress enhanced FERC and state utility commission access to holding company <br /> books and records. In addition, Congress expressly ensured that, with the repeal of FUIICA, <br /> FERC would retain its authority to require just and reasonable rates, prevent cross- <br /> subsidization, and issue such rules as are necessary to protect consumers with regard to <br />® holding company affiliates. On llecember 8, 2005, FERC issued a Final Rule to implement <br /> these new authorities (now known as PUHCA 2005). <br /> <br /> APPA believed that FERC made agood-faith effort in crafting this Final Rule. Nonetheless, <br /> inJanuary 2006 APPA joined the National Rural F,lectric Cooperative Association (NRECA) in <br />. seeking rehearing on certain aspects of the Final Rule, including FERC's decision not to <br /> include concrete measures to avoid cross-subsidization of unregulated business activities by <br /> regulated public utilities and to forego the requirement that public utilities file all relevant <br /> cost allocation agreements. In April of 2006, FERC made some limited changes in its <br /> rehearing order, but it did not grant the substantive relief APPA and NRECA had sought. In <br />. response to further rehearings filed by organizations on the opposite side of the issues from <br /> APPA and NRECA, FERC issued another order in July of 2006, in which FERC ruled that a <br />^ holding company may exclude the revenue of out-of-state exempt wholesale generators, <br /> foreign utility companies, and qualifying facilities when determining whether the holding <br /> company qualifies as a "single-state holding company system." APPA and NRECA sought <br /> rehearing of this nrling, arguing that it creates a loophole that allows large interstate holding <br /> companies to avoid regulatory scrutiny as long as their regulated public affiliates operate <br />. primarily in one state. This rehearing application is still pending as of this writing. <br />Market Manipulation Authority under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 <br />EPAct05 substantially expanded FERC authority to prohibit and to impose penalties for <br />market manipulation. The statute prohibits the submission of false information to a federal <br />. agency regarding the price of electricity or availability of transmission capacity with the intent <br />to fraudulently affect the data being compiled by that agency. There is a blanket prohibition <br />on deliberately using a manipulative contrivance or device in connection with the purchase <br />or sale of electric energy or transmission service subject to FERC's jurisdictionThe FPA now <br />permits substantial civil and criminal penalties of up to $1,000,000 per occurrence and five <br />. years in prison if these prohibitions are violated. The market manipulation provisions <br />contained in EPAct05 are applicable to all wholesale market participants, including public <br />r <br />www.APPAnet.org continued <br />