My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.6. ERMUSR 02-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2007
>
02-20-2007
>
6.6. ERMUSR 02-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2009 1:48:49 PM
Creation date
3/19/2009 1:48:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
2/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />February 7, 2007 <br />To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />Jerry Takle <br />Jim Tralle <br />Jerry Gumphrey <br />From: Bryan Adams <br />Subject: Proposed Well <br />~ phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />Due to the continued increase in water usage in Elk River, the 2007 budget contains a <br />$400,000 line item to construct an additional well. This well should be operational by the <br />summer of 2008. Attached is an annual load profile of our water demands. Because of <br />the large disparity between summer and the other season's usage, a peaking well with <br />minimal treatment is desirable. This well would only be used in the summer during <br />periods of heavy lawn sprinkling. Attached is a map of our potential well site in east Elk <br />River. <br />Our preferred site is at the Johnson Street Water Tower site. A test well was constructed <br />at this site. The test well reflected great water quantity, but the water quality would <br />require treatment. This well is high in iron and more importantly high in radium 226 and <br />228. An approximate $1,500,000 treatment plant would be required. <br />The well site in Twin Lakes Estates has good water quality and quantity but will require a <br />small (10' x 15') building to inject fluoride and chlorine. A building may be <br />objectionable to the neighbors. The other option is the River Park development, but a test <br />well should be completed at a cost of $23,000 f. <br />Staff recommends constructing another test well at the River Park location to verify our <br />options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.