My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 02-17-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2009
>
02-17-2009
>
6.2. SR 02-17-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2009 12:08:19 PM
Creation date
2/13/2009 12:08:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: V 09-01 <br />Page 3 <br />Vaziance <br />Fred McCoy <br />The lot area is approximately 5,600 square feet and the existing building with proposed addition will <br />be approximately 4,000 square feet. The ordinance states that impervious surface coverage shall not <br />exceed 25 percent of the lot area. The existing structure plus the addition would cover <br />approximately 70 percent of the lot. <br />ARplicable Regulations <br />Variance Criteria <br />7. Literal enforcement o~the ordinance will cause undue hardsh~. <br />Literal enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the applicant has a functioning business in <br />the existing building on the property. <br />2. The hardship is caused b~sbecial conditions and circumstances which are~eculiar to the~ro~erty and the <br />structure involved and avhich are not characteristic o or a~licable to other lands or structure in the same area. <br />There are no special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the property. Although <br />the bluff setback varies depending on topography, it does affect all properties in the area. <br />3. The .r~ecial conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the~etitioner's ozvn action or inaction. <br />There are no special conditions and circumstances to the property. <br />4. The literal a~~lication o~the 1~rovisions o{this ordinance avould derive the~etitioner oughts en~oyed by other <br />~rofierties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. <br />The petitioner would not be deprived any rights, as they have a functioning business in the <br />existing building on the property, as do other properties in the same district <br />5. The variance will not be injurious to or adverse a~fect the health salty or avel are o{the residents o the city or <br />the neighborhood where th~ro~erty is located and will be in keeling avith .r~irit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of the <br />residents of the city. <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 09-01 Fred McCoy\V 09-01_BA.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.