Laserfiche WebLink
Bogart, Pederson <br />& Associates, Inc. <br />LAND SURVEYING <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />MAPPING <br />Chris Leesberg, City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />cc:McCoy's Place <br />To Whom it May Concern, <br />~ N ~, 6 ~~U9 <br />I was requested, by Fred McCoy, to submit any information I had to the <br />City of Elk River, regarding the Top of Bluff information that I had and <br />how I established this on the Bluff Exhibit for Fred McCoy. On 3/26/08 I <br />received a copy of the Elk River Code showing the description of a Bluff. <br />A Bluff has the following characteristics: (an area with an average slope <br />of less that 18% over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be <br />considereU part of d l.:iuff) <br />1-located in shore land area <br />2-slope rises at least 25 feet above OHW <br />3-grade of slope from toe of bluff to a point 25 feet or more above <br />OHW averages 30a or greater <br />4-slope shall drain towards to water body <br />The Top of a Bluff definition (which the setback is measured from) is the <br />higher point of a 50 foot segment with an average slope exceeding 180. <br />I contacted Roger Stradal with the MnDNR on how the Mn <br />Bluff and a Top of Bluff. Roger agreed with the above <br />discussed using cross-sections of the area between the <br />back of the building and creating a triangle showing a <br />length) and at least an 180 slope, which would give us <br />(change in elevation over 50 feet). <br />DNR would define a <br />definitions. We <br />waters edge and the <br />50 length (segment <br />a height of 9 feet <br />I applied the 50 foot length X 18% slope triangle to Cross-Sections B & C. <br />Since the slope was much higher between the Visual Top of Bluff and the <br />area down to the water the triangle that pulled the 50 foot segment with a <br />greater than 18% slope into the `flatter' area that is between the Visual <br />Top of Bluff and the back of the buildings. There does not appear to be a <br />Top of Bluff at the location established by using the triangle. I feel <br />that since there is not a good `sample area' between the Visual Top of <br />Bluff and the back of the buildings to get more than one 50 foot segment, <br />that we should rely on the Visual Top of Bluff to establish our setback. <br />I did show the Top of Bluff and its setbacks after numerous phone calls <br />with people from the City of Elk River and the MnDNR at the Visual Top of <br />Bluff. I did not find a definition of Top of Bluff that applied directly <br />to this instance of having a sample area of less than 50 feet. The <br />`flatter' area between the Visual Top of Bluff and the back of the <br />buildings is approximately 44 and 50 feet (along Cross-Sections B & C). <br />The slope of this `flatter' area is less that 18 % and it is not for a <br />distance of 50 feet or more, but I still considered this to not be part of <br />the bluff, due to its slope. <br />Respectfully, <br />c~?~w c~.a.~ 1~Z~vq <br />Shannon Bollman, and Surveyor - <br />Bogart, Pederson and Associates <br />Main Office: Becker Phone: 763/262-8822 Maple Lake Waite Park Phone: 320!252-0409 <br />13076 First Street Toll free: 888/210-8301 311 Division St. W. Box 249 Phone: 320/963-6900 2077 Frontage Road N. Ste. 12 Toll free: 888/251-0409 <br />Becker, MN 55308 Fax: 763/262-8844 Maple Lake, MN 55358 Fax: 320/963-6060 Waite Park, MN 56387 Fax: 320/230-6859 <br />