My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 06-10-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
06-10-2008
>
5.2. ERMUSR 06-10-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2009 3:10:00 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
6/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(51%) of working women are employed by some form of public employer compared <br />to approximately 43,3% in the private sector. Productivity in some public jobs are, <br />in many cases, extremely difficult to measure and the dominance of government in <br />some industries basically dictates the prevailing wage. Being it good or bad, public <br />sector wage setting is inherently political, that is, wages are public information and <br />often reflect political priorities. Pay equity adjustments up to 1990, although not <br />necessarily comparable worth, have totaled approximately $450 million in the public <br />sector. <br />In 1984, Minnesota was the first state to adopt pay equity legislation that <br />directly addressed comparable worth. This legislation became fully implemented in <br />1991. It was suggested that Minnesota was the first state to enact such legislation <br />because of the three following reasons occurring at the same time. <br />• Strong public sector collective bargaining <br />~ Democratic control of state government <br />• Very active commission on the status of women <br />The policy section of Minnesota's Pay Equity Act is cited earlier in this <br />paper. The law does not require all jobs with the same value be paid the same. The <br />law only requires that female classes not be paid consistently below male classes of <br />comparable value. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.