My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ERMUSR FINIANCIALS 04-17-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
04-17-2008
>
ERMUSR FINIANCIALS 04-17-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2009 2:08:44 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 1:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
4/17/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />Apri17, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br />2007-1 Segregation of Duties <br />Condition: During our audit we reviewed procedures over cash disbursements, payroll and <br />investments and found areas of internal control that can be improved. <br />Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody, record keeping <br />and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these <br />four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of <br />these responsibilities. <br />Cause: In the area of cash disbursements, the Finance Officer and one account have control <br />over the entire process from authorization to reconciliation. In the payroll area, the <br />accountant has responsibility in all steps of the process. And for Investment <br />activities, the Finance Officer is solely responsible for the whole process. Another <br />concern is the safeguarding of the stamp used for checking signing. Currently a spare <br />key is kept in an unlocked vault making it available to anyone -essentially giving any <br />employee the ability to authorize a check. <br />Effect: The existence of this limited segregation of duties increases the risk of fraud. <br />Recommendation: The most effective controls lie in striving to obtain as much segregation of duties as <br />possible so that no one person has complete control of any type of financial <br />transaction. Regarding the specific situations listed above, we would offer the <br />following specific recommendations: 1) That neither the Finance officer nor the <br />accountant have control of the check signing process or wire transfer approval <br />process. 2) That a person separate from the recording and authorizing be given <br />responsibility for the reconciliation of cash and investments. 3) Stronger safeguards <br />of the signature stamps and consideration of requiring at least one actual signature. <br />Management response.• Some items have already been implemented to improve internal control and <br />segregation of duties starting in March 2008. 1) We have hired an assistant <br />accountant that does the bank reconciliation. The Finance Director will review these <br />now instead of actually performing them. 2) The key that was in the vault is now in <br />the possession of the Finance Director at all times. 3) Each check required two <br />signatures. We now have two signature stamps with an individual signature on each <br />stamp. One is kept locked in the possession of the accounts payable/payroll clerk <br />and one is kept locked in possession of the Finance Director. We are looking at <br />having a third one created that would be kept locked in possession of the General <br />Manager. <br />952.835.9090 Fax 952.835.3261 <br />www.aemcpas.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.