My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 04-17-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
04-17-2008
>
5.2. ERMUSR 04-17-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2009 1:25:30 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 1:25:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
4/17/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finally, the long term hope in the Senate is to garner the 60 votes necessary on the old, comprehensive, $18 <br />billion bill that pounds the oil and gas guys but still does not include the proper CREB language. This is wishful <br />+hinking for Democrats, who hope to move a tax bill to the floor before Memorial Day recess. <br />dUCLEAR <br />A new tax bill obviously offers an opportunity for public power to include the nuclear PTC language, despite <br />some major hurdles. APPA and LPPC are working together on this issue, including an upcoming meeting with <br />NEI (the coops are also invited). <br />CLIMATE <br />The Senate still leads in this category: yesterday Majority Leader Reid told supporters of Lieberman-Warner <br />that floor time is now being reserved for the first week in June, despite the absence of the magical 60 votes. <br />However, Sens. Lieberman and Boxer are now suggesting they have 45 hard votes, and a possible 15, <br />depending on how the floor debate proceeds. Large questions still loom: <br />• Is floor time on this controversial issue worth the political risk for the Democrats, especially in this volatile <br />election year? <br />• At crunch time, can the Dems get close to 60 votes? <br />• Can the Dems overcome the large number of amendments that will surely come (200, 100, or even 50 serious <br />amendments)? <br />• With the downturn in the economy, and possible waning of climate as a priority issue, is this the time to bring up <br />the leading Senate bill? <br />• Does the Senate look silly if the House is taking a more measured, inclusive approach to their legislation? <br />In addition, supporters of moving a bill still are unhappy with Chairman Boxer's floor strategy -she stated <br />she'd pull the bill if "bad things" started happening on the floor. Not a very cooperative thing to say. Finally, <br />the environmental community seriously wanting floor debate, let alone a bill, is still an open question. <br />The House, meanwhile, proceeds - as the House moves to developing its legislation Rick Boucher's <br />abcommittee has announced a climate hearing next week that will look at possible changes to the Clean Air <br />Act as a way to tackle ghg emissions. <br />FARM BILL <br />Two steps forward, one step back. With another deadline of April 18looming-possibly the last extension <br />granted-key negotiators are still haggling over final numbers/cost, and pay-fors. This is now an open, ugly, <br />and divisive process, with lots of finger pointing. Bottom line: the Senate wants an additional $10 billion over <br />the baseline, including a tax package full of special treatment projects, to go for conservation and disaster <br />programs; the House has finally caved to the $10 billion but doesn't want to give on a new tax title - no extra <br />goodies. And Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel remains resolute on his priority -nutrition programs. <br />If the deadline is not met two weeks from now there is serious consideration to extending the current farm bill <br />for one year -admitting, like for so many other issues, getting through the elections and getting to a new <br />Congress is a real option. <br />Michael Nolan <br />MJN Consulting LLC <br />202.359.4496 <br />__ <br />Going green? See the top 12 foods to eat organic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.