My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. ERMUSR 03-11-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
03-11-2008
>
6.3. ERMUSR 03-11-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2009 1:16:55 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 1:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />January 14, 2003 <br />George Zabee said that since the Tower sits in the middle of the old town of Elk River, there may be <br />some significance for saving it. James Tralle questioned if the Tower would last another sixty years, with <br />repairs. Bryan Adams ans~~~ered that concrete around the anchor bolts was cracking, but if repairs are <br />accomplished, and regular maintenance perfornled, it should last for many years. John Alfords asked if cell <br />phone companies would really be willing to put antennas on such an old structure. He further asked why the <br />site is not fenced to prevent trespassing, or vandalism. Commission said that would be an item to further <br />discuss. James Tralle thinks that the Tower should be repaired, and gamble that it would eventually be used <br />for a cell phone tower site when the economy improves. Bryan advised that quotes would need to be <br />obtained for repairs. <br />James Tralle moved to keep and to perform necessary repairs to the Jackson Street `Vater To~~-er. <br />John Dietz seconded the motion. Motion carried 2-0, George Zabee abstained. <br />Items 6.3, and 6.4 will be discussed before 5.2, to accommodate Tem~ iVlaurer's presence at the <br />meeting. <br />G.~ Feasibility Study -Boston and Concord St. Utilih- and Street Im ~rovements <br />The pertinent sections of the feasibility study for Boston Street and Concord Street Utility and Street <br />Improvements prepared by Terry Maurer of Howard Green Company were reviewed. Terry Maurer, and <br />Bryan Adams responded to questions from the Commission, saving that ultimately they believe the subject <br />viii be dropped for lack of interest by citizens. <br />James Tralle moved to recei~ e and file the Feasibility Study -Boston and Concord St. Utility and <br />Street Improvements. John Dietz seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br />6.6 Feasibilih~ Study - 2003 Paycnrent Rehabilitation Improvements <br />The Feasibility Study-2003 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements was discussed. The question of <br />offtrin~~ to re-place curb stops on ,Morton was the center of the discussion. It is believed that doing so while <br />the street is under construction ~~~ould be advantageous to citizens, as well as the Utilities, and City. It is not <br />known at this time ho~a~ many customers this would impact, but it could be as few as two. Terry Maurer <br />explained the Feasibility Study expenditures. <br />~.2 IZeyic~y ~ Consider 2003 ~b'ire <br />Staff presented a bid tabulation for 2003 electric wire needs. The difference between EPR versus <br />XLP wire was discussed. Glenn Sundeen responded to questions noting that the EPR has superior <br />workability, and longevity. <br />George Zabee moves to accept low bids, with the exception of approval of the recommended EPR <br />wire from Resco, at a slightly higher amount than the lower cost XLP. John Dietz seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried 3-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.