My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. ERMUSR 01-15-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
01-15-2008
>
5.4. ERMUSR 01-15-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2009 9:09:15 AM
Creation date
1/28/2009 9:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
1/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ PACE <br />Fourth Quarter 2007 <br />On the heels of establishing record high levels of <br />liquefied natural gas ("LNG") imports into the U.S., <br />November imports hit their lowest levels in three years. <br />Of course, members of the easily-spooked "permanently <br />short" club suggest that the dream of LNG is over. Could <br />they be correct? A closer look at fundamentals in the <br />global LNG market suggests otherwise. <br />The year 2007 began with "normal levels" of LNG imports <br />in the U. S. -around 1.5 Bcf per day for January and <br />February. March came as a pleasant surprise to the U.S. <br />natural gas market when LNG ships lined up to its <br />domestic ports and imports climbed to nearly 2.9 Bcf per <br />day for the month and up again to just over 3.1 Bcf per <br />day in April, a level that was more or less maintained <br />through September. Many in the industry agree that the <br />sudden increase in U.S. LNG traffic can be attributed to <br />increased global liquefaction capacity <br />coming online over the winter of 2006- <br />07, as well as increased natural gas <br />production from Norway and mild <br />weather in the U.K. and continental <br />Europe. Still the question remains, <br />what happened in November? To be <br />certain, there are many factors at work <br />in the intricacies of the global LNG <br />market, but for the purposes of <br />simplicity we will focus the account on <br />two markets which had the greatest <br />amount of influence: Japan and Europe. <br />On July 16 the world's largest nuclear generation facility, <br />the 8.5 gigawatt Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, sustained <br />major collateral damage from a 6.8 magnitude <br />earthquake. Efforts have been underway to repair the <br />facility and bring it back online. Meanwhile, Japan is <br />buying up massive quantities of LNG, coal and fuel oil <br />from the global market to run thermal plants (which were <br />previously offline) in an attempt to maintain the integrity <br />of the power grid so they may continue to churn out steel <br />and big boats that carry -wait for it -LNG, coal and fuel <br />oil. This is having a significant, likely short term, impact <br />on the global LNG and dry bulk shipping markets. <br />The European gas market is the main competitor for LNG <br />to North America, where prices in each of the relevant <br />markets - U.S., U.K. and continental Europe -determine <br />the course of LNG cargoes throughout the year. <br />Transportation economics play a role in the transatlantic <br />arbitrage as opportunities to redirect ships occur when <br />the price differential for a commodity exceeds the <br />corresponding transportation costs. <br />However, the larger question is that of <br />the commodity cost on either side of <br />the ocean and underlying pricing <br />dynamics of their respective markets. <br />Europe is surrounded by major gas <br />supply provinces which include the <br />North Sea, Russia and Algeria. <br />However, due to geological <br />constraints, there is lack of natural <br />gas storage in the region. The U.K. <br />has particularly limited working gas capacity, especially <br />evident when viewed as a percentage of its consumption. <br />The U.K. consumes approximately 3.6 Tcf of natural gas <br />per annum and has but 141 Bcf of storage capacity <br />(~4.0%), in comparison to the U.S. which has an annual <br />Proprietary and ConfidenAiai <br />www.paceglobal.com <br />Is Liquefied Natural Gas a Dream or Reality? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.