Laserfiche WebLink
varying quality. Management activities can influence one or more aspects of the <br />managed community and have lasting, long-term implications. To avert any possible <br />damages and to make sure that the best possible practices are used for restoring <br />natural communities, it is important to monitor chosen aspects of those communities on <br />a regular basis. <br />Vegetation monitoring should also be conducted to watch for shifts in the plant <br />community composition due to management activities. Under certain conditions, <br />activities such as fire have the ability to increase the presence of some species at the <br />expense of others. If detrimental changes are spotted early, resource management <br />activities can be adjusted to prevent significant shifts in community function or <br />composition. <br />When monitoring the site, a specific effort should be made to annually inspect for the <br />presence of oak wilt. As with other stages of the restoration process, monitoring should <br />be carried out on a regular basis to provide for determining resource management <br />effectiveness. Also important will be monitoring for excessive human disturbance such <br />as off-trail erosion, tree cutting, dumping, etc. <br />Monitoring can be an expensive and labor-intensive process that has the potential to <br />take valuable monetary and human resources away from the process of active <br />management if not exercised judiciously. Deciding what to monitor and how intensively <br />to monitor is always difficult. Some aspects of management can be monitored through <br />visual inspection with field notes recorded and shared between the park and the <br />resource manager. Other aspects may require that quantitative monitoring be <br />undertaken, such as long-term monitoring of rare plants/animals, although rare species <br />are not part of the equation with this restoration project. <br />As part of the process of visually inspecting areas and assessing management efficacy <br />without quantitative monitoring, it would be recommendable to keep a field journal of <br />management activities, such as one found in the appendices of this report. This could <br />be used by the natural resource manager for the purpose of tracking observations <br />made. These observations may include species noted, fire effects, unusual weather <br />events, human disturbance, activities of work crews in the forest and buffer, and the <br />quality of their work performed, as well as many others. <br />Although this type of information may not be quantitative, it is crucial to help with <br />adapting management strategies in the future. This is especially true for the long-term, <br />since personnel and policy changes within organizations are inevitable. This <br />information would give future managers the benefit of insight on daily and yearly <br />activities within the forest as they relate to resource management. <br />Photomonitoring <br />Top of the World Park Addition Natural Area Management Plan 14 <br />