Laserfiche WebLink
outside air through a condenser. In order for heat to flow from the refrigerant in the condenser to <br />the outside air, the refrigerant must be at a high temperature and pressure (referred to as the head <br />pressure). This high temperature and pressure is generated by the compressors that pump the <br />refrigerant through the various parts of the refrigeration system. Since the compressors are the <br />primary energy users in the refrigeration system, reducing the head pressure will save significant <br />amounts of energy and reduce wear on the compressors. Many direct refrigeration systems will <br />operate properly with head pressures as low as 150 psi, while many indirect systems (those with <br />thermostatic expansion valves) may need higher pressures of 175 psi. Typical annual energy <br />cost savings that can be realized with only a 20 to 25 psi reduction are $400 to $1,000 for asix- <br />month arena and $900 to $1,800 for facilities that operate 9 months or more. <br />The head pressure can be reduced in two ways: (1) by manual adjustment or (2) by replacing <br />standard condenser controls with more efficient automated condenser control systems (see <br />refrigeration system section). The refrigeration industry has traditionally encouraged <br />maintaining a higher than necessary head pressure by turning off fans that blow outside air <br />through the condenser and/or by using a pump that sprays water over the condenser. These <br />approaches are very conservative in terms of ensuring adequate cooling of the ice under the most <br />taxing conditions; however, these practices unnecessarily increase energy costs and wear on the <br />compressors during periods of normal arena operation. This energy conservation method has <br />already been successfully implemented in several Minnesota ice arenas. <br />LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS <br />Efficient Lighting Fixtures for Public Spaces <br />A number of existing technologies can make interior and exterior lighting significantly more <br />energy efficient. The impact any particular lighting improvement has on operating costs depends <br />heavily on the hours of operation. Obviously, fixtures which are operated 24 hours a day will <br />provide more savings from high efficiency improvements than similar fixtures that only operate <br />for a fraction of each day. Maintenance costs for replacing spent fixtures must also be <br />considered when calculating the paybacks of lighting improvements. <br />There are six main types of lighting improvements which are feasible in most ice arenas. Ice <br />sheet lighting recommendations are dealt with in the next section. <br />Replacing standard incandescent lamps or "light bulbs" with more efficient fluorescent lamps <br />will use 30 to 80 percent less electricity per lamp while producing the same light levels. In <br />addition, maintenance costs will be reduced since fluorescent lamps last 5 to 12 times longer <br />than standard incandescents. <br />2. Replacing existing four or eight foot fluorescent fixtures with high efficiency fluorescent T-8 <br />lamps and improved electronic ballasts can provided significant cost savings. <br />3. Public areas such as halls, corridors, and lobbies often have more fixtures than are needed for <br />desired light levels. Wasted light can easily be eliminated by either using lower wattage <br />ballasts (dewatting) or disconnecting unnecessary ballasts (delamping). <br />Page 2 Energy Improvements in Minnesota Public Ice Arenas Project <br />Center for Energy & Environment <br />