My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 01-13-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
01-13-2009
>
5.2. ERMUSR 01-13-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2009 3:44:18 PM
Creation date
1/13/2009 3:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
1/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Not long after the July 21 meeting MREA informed us that they wanted to put the process <br />on hold while they consulted with their membership. Our sources tell us that a small but <br />vocal group of co-ops preferred the status quo to a negotiated deal. There were also some <br />members of the MREA board, which is composed of local co-op board members rather <br />than system managers, who were not favorably disposed toward a negotiated settlement. <br />We anticipated that MREA would tell us they wanted to re-open some items that had <br />previously been agreed upon. Instead, on December 17 Norm Krause, chair of the <br />MREA board, sent a letter to Gary Gleisner to inform us that they were terminating the <br />process. The letter is included with this memo as Attachment A. <br />Needless to say, this is a very disappointing end to a process that at one point appeared <br />very promising. We anticipate that the MMUA service territory negotiating team will <br />reconvene soon to consider an appropriate response. <br />At this point there aze several observations we can make about the negotiation effort: <br />• Our side was better prepazed than they were through every step of the process, a <br />fact that was obvious to both sides. <br />• Some players on the co-op side were probably surprised by our willingness to <br />engage in the hard work of finding a comprehensive solution to a difficult <br />problem, and to make the concessions necessary to enable the two sides to find <br />common ground. <br />• We will want to be ready in case the co-ops decide to launch a surprise attack on <br />our right to use the eminent domain process in service territory cases. (But we <br />think they will be cautious about picking a fight with us, having seen how well <br />prepared we were in the service temtory negotiations.} <br />Conservation and CIP. At the 2007 MMUA annual meeting the membership approved <br />a resolution authorizing an assessment on electric utilities of a small percentage of their <br />CIP requirements in order to fund an MMUA position dedicated to working on <br />conservation and related issues. 2008 was the first year of the assessment. Bob Jagusch, <br />formerly the Superintendent at Mora, began his employment with MMUA as Director of <br />Energy Services on Mazch 24. <br />Bob's first few months at MMUA were largely devoted to helping MMUA members <br />prepare their biannual CIP reports, which were due in June. Bob worked very closely <br />with the Office of Energy Security on preparing the filings, and as a result of his work, <br />OES greatly simplified the reporting form. <br />Aside from the CIP reporting process, Bob's efforts over the year break down into these <br />broad categories: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.