My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. SR 03-24-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
03/24/2003
>
5.5. SR 03-24-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:20 AM
Creation date
3/21/2003 5:51:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Locally Funded City Streets - Cities under 5,000 <br />Minnesota's smaller cities - those with populations under 5,000 - are not eligible for any state aid <br />funding for collector or arterial streets, regardless of the traffic volume that these streets support. In <br />theory, the state distribution to the counties through the County State Aid Highway distribution is in <br />part intended to support these roadways, however, in practice there is insufficient funds to finance all <br />small city roadway needs. As a result, city owned roadways in these cities are classified as "municipal <br />streets" in the terminology used by Mn/DOT, and are financed exclusively with revenue sources <br />generated locally, which means the property tax. <br /> <br />Findings <br /> <br />#B-l: Most small cities are not spending enough on roadway capital improvements to maintain <br />a 50 year life cycle. <br /> <br />One of the principal goals of the 2002 City Road andBridge F~mding Survey was to assess the <br />spending trends of Minnesota cities relative to the projected spending that would be required to sustain <br />a life cycle of 50 years. In this report, we borrow from the methodology applied by Greg Isakson, the <br />Goodhue County Engineer, who has established this analytical method for determining the life cycle <br />needs of Minnesota's system of county roads. <br /> <br />The survey returned data on 108 cities under 5,000 <br />in population on the question of each city's <br />spending level for the three principal roadway <br />construction/maintenance activities discussed in <br />this report: 1) construction/reconstruction (which <br />implies initial grading or regrading the roadway <br />surface) which occurs once in a 50 year life cycle; <br />2) overlaying the pre-existing surface (which we <br />assume to occur twice in a 50 year life cycle) and <br />3) sealcoating the surface (which we assume to <br />occur six times over the 50 year life cycle). Figure <br />27 presents a "typical" life cycle construction and <br />maintenance activity schedule that would allow a <br />paved roadway to last for 50 years. <br /> <br />Figure 27 <br />"Typical" 50 Year Life Cycle Roadway <br />Construction and Maintenance Activity Schedule <br /> Activity Interval Year <br /> Construction 1 <br /> Sealcoat 2 3 <br /> Sealcoat 7 10 <br /> Overlay 7 17 <br /> Sealcoat 2 19 <br /> Sealcoat 7 26 <br /> Overlay 7 33 <br /> Sealcoat 2 35 <br /> Sealcoat 7 42 <br /> Regrade 7 49 <br /> <br />To identify projected costs, the methodology applied in this analysis requires that a typical cost per <br />mile be estimated for the three activities that comprise the construction and maintenance schedule. In <br />this analysis, it is estimated that the per-mile cost of regrading is $200,000 per mile, the cost of an <br />overlay is $40,000 per mile, and the cost of a sealcoat is $5,000 per mile. (These values are consistent <br />with the cost estimates used in the county needs study and are on par with all of the cities who reported <br />activity costs.) <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.