My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. SR 03-24-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
03/24/2003
>
5.5. SR 03-24-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:20 AM
Creation date
3/21/2003 5:51:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 4: Key Findings / Policy Options <br />The previous sections of this report have provided general information on the current city road and <br />bridge infrastructure, current funding mechanisms, and future funding challenges. The back~ound <br />information provided in the "transportation primer" contained in Sections 1 - 3 is critica! to <br />understanding the broad trends and policies that affect city policy makers as they strive to maintain and <br />improve their transportation infrastructure while providing the best possible value to the taxpayer. <br /> <br />In this section of the report, the focus is shifted to a discussion of key findings relating to current road <br />and bridge infrastructure investment trends, and their impact on Minnesota cities' ability to invest in <br />road and bridge maintenance and improvements. Following the discussion of the key findings, the <br />report suggests specific policy options that merit consideration by state policy makers as a means of <br />providing tools to assist cities in their efforts to maintain their road and bridge capital assets. <br /> <br />The findings and policy options presented in this section are organized such that the findings and <br />policy options involving certain types of city roadways are contained in a single subsection. The only <br />exception is the first subsection, which contains findings and policy options that apply to all roadway <br />types, regardless of city size or the funding source. The purpose for organizing the key findings and <br />policy options in this manner is to facilitate review of the report by policy makers and others who are <br />primarily interested in the findings and policy options that involve specific city road and bridge <br />systems. <br /> <br />For that reason, the subsections are organized as follows: <br /> <br /> All City Systems: <br />This subsection presents key findings and potential policy responses that apply to all Minnesota <br />cities, regardless of size or roadway classification. <br /> <br /> Locally Funded City Streets - Cities under 5,000: <br />This subsection addresses 100 percent of roadways located in Minnesota's 724 cities with <br />populations under 5,000. These cities are not eligible to receive state aid for local road and bridge <br />funding from the Municipal State Aid program, and are obligated to finance all of their local road <br />and bridge projects with their own revenue sources. <br /> <br /> Locally Funded City Streets - Cities over 5,000: <br />This subsection addresses the 80 percent of city roadways (excluding state trunk highway and <br />county roadways) located in Minnesota's 130 largest cities that receive no state funding through <br />the state aid formula known as Municipal State Aid (MSA). These roadways are appropriately <br />funded with locally generated revenues. <br /> <br /> State Funded City Streets - Cities Over 5,000: <br />This subsection addresses 20 percent of city roadways in Minnesota's largest 130 cities that receive <br />state aid funding from the MSA program. <br /> <br />The findings reported in this section come from two primary sources. First, two divisions of the <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation: the State Aid for Local Transportation Group and the Office <br />of Transportation Data and Analysis generously provided staff assistance as well as a number of <br />valuable written and electronic reports focusing on the roadway construction and maintenance needs of <br />Minnesota cities. (For example, the "Legislative Study of State Funding for Local Road <br />Improvements" prepared by Mn/DOT's State Aid for Local Transportation Group at the request of the <br />2000 Legislature was a primary source of information used in this report.) <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.