Laserfiche WebLink
more equitable way to distribute the costs to those who benefit the most, while minimizing the demand <br />on the city tax levy and statutory debt limitations. <br /> <br />Special assessments are workable in some circumstances, but not all. First, special assessment <br />proceedings are cumbersome. The city must present evidence to prove that the assessment does not <br />exceed the benefit, and in many instances, the cost of the improvement does in fact exceed the benefit <br />to the properties, so the amount assessed fails to cover the expense. Most cities are able to special <br />assess only 25 percent to 50 percent of street reconstruction projects. Second, local officials often have <br />strong reservations about special assessments since they may result in financial hardship for certain <br />residents, particularly those living on fixed incomes. Unlike the general property tax, special <br />assessments are not tax deductible, so affected property owners must bear the full cost. <br /> <br />State Funding Sources <br />In general, the state of Minnesota has three ways to provide funding to Minnesota cities to support <br />local roads and bridges: 1) regular state general fund appropriations, 2) the Municipal State Aid <br />program, and 3) state bonding. <br /> <br />General Fund Appropriations <br />The state has at times appropriated state general funds for specific local road and bridge programs or <br />projects. As an example, the state provided "one-time" funds during the 2000 Legislative session to <br />specific city streets ($6.2 million) and to local bridges ($39 million for both city and county bridge <br />structures). It is fair, however, to characterize the state general fund appropriations to Minnesota cities <br />as limited, even during healthy economic times. <br /> <br />Municipal State Aid (MSA) <br />The second way that Minnesota cities receive funding directly from the state is through the Municipal <br />State Aid (MSA) program, which was first implemented in 1958. The MSA program is administered <br />by the Mn/DOT State Aid for Local Transportation Group, and provides funding to support city roads <br />and bridges in cities in which the population exceeds 5,000. In 2002, 130 cities qualified for MSA <br />assistance. MSA provides funding support for 2,818 miles of roadway, which is about 15 percent of <br />the total city street mileage statewide (including all Minnesota cities - MSA eligible large cities and <br />the remaining small cities). If one considers only the mileage in the 130 MSA eligible cities, the <br />program provides aid to support about 20 percent of those cities' total mileage. The MSA program <br />provided $117 million to eligible cities in 2001. <br /> <br />Cities that receive MSA may use the payment to support maintenance and construction on its eligible <br />mileage by using any of the following options: <br /> <br />· Use the current allocation tofinance currentprojects. <br /> Borrow against the city's future MSA allocation. This option, known as the General Fund <br /> Advance option, allows a city to borrow funds for improvements from the city's general fund, <br /> and with the approval of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, repay the loan with the <br /> city's annual MSA allocation over a period not to exceed the following five years. <br />· Issue bonds that can be repaid with MSA funds. The city is limited to borrowing no more than <br /> the amount that will allows the annual debt service to be less than 50 percent of the city's most <br /> recent annual MSA construction allocation. <br />· Use MSAfunds to fulfill costparticipation responsibilities associated with county or Mn/DOT <br /> projects. <br />· Request funds from the state's "turnback" account. This option applies only in specific <br /> circumstances. Under state law, if Mn/DOT "turns back" a former Trunk Highway to a local <br /> <br /> <br />