Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Neighborhood Development, Transportation Oriented Development -slightly different <br />names but largely the same goals and principles. At the National Governors Association, <br />they call it New Community Design. And in their publication -New Community Design to <br />the Rescue -they have established a set of principles, and they are these: <br />• Mixed use <br />• Community interaction <br />• Transportation/walkability <br />• Tree lined streets <br />• Open space <br />• Efficient use of infrastructure <br />• Houses close to the street <br />• Diverse housing <br />• High density <br />• Reduced land consumption <br />• Links to adjacent communities <br />• Enhances surrounding communities <br />• Pedestrian friendly <br />Great list. Building cities in that fashion would certainly advance the sustainable <br />development agenda. But you know what? We don't need new community design to rescue <br />us. That list of principles is exactly what our historic neighborhoods are providing right <br />now. We just need to make sure they are protected. <br />On the commercial side if we want to begin to mitigate the endless expanse of strip center <br />sprawl it is critical that we have effective programs of center city revitalization. <br />Throughout North America over the last decade, we have seen downtowns come back <br />and reclaim their historic role as the multifunctional, vibrant, heart of the city. Now this is <br />the area where I do most of my work. I typically visit 100 downtowns a year of every <br />size, in every part of the country. But I cannot identify a single example of a sustained <br />success story in downtown revitalization where historic preservation wasn't a key <br />component of that strategy. Not a one. Conversely, the examples of very expensive failures <br />in downtown revitalization -Detroit leaps immediately to mind -have nearly all had the <br />destruction of historic buildings as a major element. That doesn't mean, I suppose, that it's <br />not theoretically possible to have downtown revitalization and no historic preservation, but I <br />haven't seen it, I haven't read of it, I haven't heard of it. Now the relative importance of <br />preservation as part of the downtown revitalization effort will vary some, depending on the <br />local resources, the age of the city, the strength of the local preservation advocacy groups, <br />and the enlightenment of the leadership. But successful revitalization and no historic <br />preservation? It ain't happening. <br />Next on my list of heritage conservation's contribution to the environmental area of <br />sustainable development is embodied energy. I have to confess that this is an area that I <br />hadn't paid much attention to, not until I saw oil hitting $70 a barrel. So I did a bit of <br />research. Embodied energy is defined as the total expenditure of energy involved in the <br />creation of the building and its constituent materials. When we throw away a heritage <br />