My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2005 HPC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Heritage Preservation Commission
>
HPC Minutes
>
2000-2010
>
2005
>
01-10-2005 HPC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2009 9:31:33 AM
Creation date
1/12/2009 1:05:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HPAG
date
1/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Economic Development Authority Minutes <br />January 10, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Tveite (EDA) stated that he supports the concept of the overlay. He felt that <br />the key to its success would be to have very specific goals and objectives when an area <br />comes up for review, and that the definitions should be very clear. IVIr. Rohlf stated that this <br />would need to be done before approaching the property owners. <br />Mr. Klaers stated that the Old Town design standards would be in place until a new overlay <br />district was established. He stated that they would need to determine what was best for the <br />long term goals of the entire city. <br />Corrunissioner Kluizing (EDA) stated that she did not want the downtown business owners <br />to have the impression that they were "picking on them", and was not sure if this was the <br />time to approach them, given the impact of the Downtown Rivitalization Project. She <br />suggested that they may need time to heal. She noted that the downtown is going to change <br />a great deal in the next 2 years and they should proceed with caution. <br />President Gongoll (EDA) suggested that the HPC talk with the Rivers Edge group to see <br />what their level of interest was, and determine how to approach a project. He suggested that <br />the language of the ordinance be refined, and to review the financial aspect - how to make <br />the financial incentives attractive, and to refine policies for tools such as the Micro Loan <br />Program. <br />Ms. Mehelich noted that the Rivers Edge group is made up of a number of tenants, and the <br />property owners may not necessarily be represented in this organization. <br />Commissioner Kragness stated that the City of Anoka is well ahead in its historic <br />preservation program, and that the City of Elk River needs to do more research. <br />Mr. Rohlf stated that by meeting with the Rivers Edge group, they would be able to <br />detemune if there is interest in financial incentives, or if the whole issue is just too sensitive <br />at this time. Commissioner Wilson (HIZA) stated that they may also see an opportunity. He <br />stated that he felt the incentives that were mentioned ($50,000 Micro Loan) maybe too <br />small, given the cost of relatively minor improvements, such as removing and replacing <br />windows, and that more financial participation will be required. <br />Commissioner Toth stated that he would caution restoration of facades on all of the <br />downtown buildings, since some of them are very plain underneath. <br />It was of HRA, EDA and HPC's consensus that another meeting could be held following <br />more research on the issue. <br />2. Adjournment <br />There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. <br />Submitted by, <br />~Q~e ~~~~ <br />Debbie Huebner <br />Recording Secretary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.