Laserfiche WebLink
ran~ng from 950 in the northern part of the district to 925 at the southern margin. The <br />thickness of unsaturated sand and gravel ranges between 40 and 70 feet. The water table <br />aquifer is approximately 30 feet thick throughout the mining district." <br /> <br />"Various other sand and gravel units are present beneath the water table aquifer. The first <br />confined glacial aquifer beneath the water table aquifer occurs at a general elevation of <br />860 NGVD with a variable thickness of between 20 and 80 feet. This unit is utilized as <br />the primary water supply for residential developments west of the district. Other deeper <br />glacial aquifers are also present but are limited in thickness. The Mt. Simon-Hinckley <br />formations combine to form one confined aquifer and together are generally 150 feet <br />thick. There are no significant aquifer units beneath the Mt. Simon-Hinckley aquifer." <br /> <br /> "The esker complex contains numerous depressions both natural and man-made that <br /> influence the shallow groundwater flow system. The sand and gravel surficial material is <br /> conducive to the rapid infiltration of precipitation and surface water depression storage <br /> into the water table. Accordingly, standing water in these areas frequently represents a <br /> surface expression of the water table. The flow patterns of the water table aquifer are <br /> primarily controlled by recharge and discharge, surface topography and the relative <br />· permeability of the shallow geologic materials in the area. Shallow groundwater <br /> discharge likely occurs at springs near the base of slopes or into topographically low <br /> streams or wetlands." <br /> <br />Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these <br />hazards. <br /> <br />General measures for minimizing risk to groundwater are noted below. <br /> <br />Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss <br />soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or <br />chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to <br />prevent such contamination. <br /> <br />The following is a listing of the Site soils as identified in the Soil Survey of Sherburne <br />County, Minnesota, dated May 1998 (Soil Survey). A map depicting the numbered units <br />is included as Figure 8 in Appendix A. <br /> <br />158B Zimmerman fine sand 3 to 6% slopes <br />158E Zimmerman fine sand 12 to 25% slopes <br />162 Lino loamy fine sand 0 to 2% slopes <br />540 Seelyeville muck 0 to 1% slopes <br />730B Sanburn fine sandy loam 2 to 6% slopes <br />1109 Isanti loamy fine sand 0 to 2% slopes <br />1253B Stonelake-Sanburn Complex 1 to 6% slopes <br />1253C Stonelake-Sanburn Complex 6 to 15% slopes <br />1253E Stonelake-Sanbum Complex 15 to 40% slopes <br />1254 Rice Lake fine sandy loam 0 to 3% slopes <br />1260E Stonelake-Nebish Complex 12 to 25% slopes <br /> <br /> LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />Hydrogeologists · Engineers · Environmental Scientists <br /> <br />· Jan-2003 - · Page 14 · <br /> <br /> <br />