My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. ERMUSR 08-12-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2008
>
08-12-2008
>
5.3. ERMUSR 08-12-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2008 1:30:11 PM
Creation date
12/15/2008 1:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/12/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#3 Well drawdown is becoming a larger concern. We are paying more attention to our <br />aquifer levels to ensure we are not over pumping our wells. The reason for this concern <br />is the large water withdraws in the summer due to lawn sprinkling. <br />#4 The daily and monthly pumpage graphs reflect a large disparity between winter and <br />summer usage again from lawn sprinkling. Of the 8 wells and 4 water towers on our <br />system, 5 wells could be taken off line and 1 water tower is taken off line in the winter <br />because they are only needed to support the sprinkling requirements. This represents <br />approximately $6.5 million of infrastructure investments being utilized only 5-6 months <br />of the year. Another reason our inclining block rate structure reflects the true cost of <br />water. <br />#5 The water department budget reflects little if any positive margins. If the $2.5 million <br />budget, $2.18 million comes from water sales while approximately $650,000 is P & I on <br />current debt. Our water rates are set to capture only the amount of money we need to <br />meet our financial objectives. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.