My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. SR 05-13-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
05/13/1996 - SPECIAL/JOINT
>
6.0. SR 05-13-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:19 AM
Creation date
3/12/2003 8:53:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/13/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Of local interest, a legal challenge won by the City of Woodbury, MN established that a <br />temporary moratorium does not constitute a taking, and this decision has been cited in court <br />decisions in at least fifteen other states. <br /> <br />B. Procedure. <br /> <br />Procedure, on the other hand, is the basis for an increasing number of lawsuits, and there is no <br />doubt that this trend will continue in the future. One reason is that the judgments include the <br />payment of the winning attorneys' fees, and attorneys can be very creative in submitting their <br />bills. Most of the legal action is based on a civil rights law passed in the last century (42 USC <br />1983) which guarantees the right to a fair hearing. (Rodney King's successful Federal <br />prosecution was based on this law.) Procedure includes several elements. <br /> <br />1. ExPane Contacts. <br /> <br />This is the legal term for all contacts outside the official hearing on an application. States vary <br />considerably in the treatment of these contacts. A number of states absolutely prohibit all ex <br />pane contacts, period. Other states recognize that in small communities, it is very difficult to <br />avoid conversations about upcoming issues. Most states require that any contacts, and the <br />conversations, be disclosed at the planning commission meeting. Some commissions have a <br />regular item on the agenda for disclosing contacts. <br /> <br />In a State of Washington court decision, it was determined that an ex pane contact violated the <br />civil rights of an applicant, and so the number of contacts in that state has decreased <br />dramatically. According to one speaker at the conference, this will be an increasingly <br />sensitive issue over the next five years in land use decisions, and will probably also affect <br />elected officials who have a perceived duty to listen to constituents. <br /> <br />For the Elk River Planning Commission, it may be important to have a section on ex pane <br />contacts in our Rules and Procedures. I would suggest that when these contacts are made, it is <br />extremely important that no opinion on the part of the commissioner be expressed, either <br />verbally or non-verbally, that the contact be invited to give his or her testimony at a public <br />hearing, either orally or in writing, where all the commissioners can receive the same <br />information, and that the contact be disclosed at the planning commission meeting. <br /> <br />2. Notice. <br /> <br />It was recommended that at each meeting, we have a Certificate of Notice from the staff, <br />certifying that all the proper procedures for notice were carried out, and that this be approved. <br />Our minutes usually begin with "Pursuant to due call and notice thereof..." and the minutes <br />are approved at the following meeting. This may be similar to approving a Certificate of <br />Notice, but then there is a question about the role of minutes. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.