Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Discussion <br />Planning Commissioners questioned the parking lot of 203 vehicles, with 750 students at maturity. John <br />Myhre, representing the applicant, noted that much of the demographics are trending toward online <br />courses. Maximum student population includes online, day, and evening classes. <br />Commissioners further questioned 19314 improvements and access, and if the road can accommodate <br />additional traffic. Staff responded that improvements to the 1931/ Evans intersection are planned, and <br />are expected to be completed at the end of the project. The improvements will include design for a <br />signal, although the signal is not included in the project. <br />Public Comment <br />Michelle Koteles, an adjacent resident, voiced concerns with the lighting (internal building and site) from <br />the development impacting their house and suggested additional trees on the east of the drive. She also <br />questioned plans for expansion. <br />Staff responded that the lighting is regulated by the City Code relative to minimum and maximum light <br />levels for commercial districts, and that the lighting plan complies with these requirements. <br />Keith Schupp, representing the applicant, noted that the building is not being designed to accommodate <br />increased height in response to Ms. Koteles' concerns about expansion. <br />No other comments were received. <br />Attachments <br />• Staff Report to Planning Commission dated November 10, 2008 <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\CUP\CU 08-21 Winkelman (MSB)\CC staff report 11-17-08.doc <br />