My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION #2 11-17-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2008
>
11-17-2008
>
INFORMATION #2 11-17-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2008 10:07:24 AM
Creation date
11/14/2008 9:24:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/17/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Farnum's reasoning is that Big Lake will receive national and international attention from media related to races and <br />events, therefore making Big Lake an even more desirable location. <br />Gindele and Olson couldn't <br />disagree more. <br />"Who would want to live next to a racetrack?" Gindele questioned. <br />The two both agreed that loud noise and frequent congestion would not help the market value of their homes. <br />But for Cindy Lambing, she isn't too concerned with putting Big Lake on the map and gaining popularity, citing the <br />peace and simpler way of life as the reasons she chose to move to the area more off the beaten path in the first place. <br />"I moved out here for peace and quiet and (a) friendly, small-town community," she said. "That would be lost with a <br />mixed-use motorsports facility." <br />Also, with the proposal putting the area so close to the Mississippi River, Lambing is also concerned about losing the <br />wildlife. <br />"I will lose the bald eagles in my backyard," she said. <br />At the end of the presentation, the vice chairman of the Big Lake Town Board, Larry Alfords, told the IMEDC <br />representative they might have a tough sell on the idea. For example, Farnum said noise would be minimal, but <br />everyone wants to know the specifics of that statement. <br />"It's generalities," he said. "You haven't come out and said exactly what you're talking about." <br />Alfords cited other issues related to the proximity to residents and falling within the Shoreline Management Act because <br />of the closeness to the river. <br />As of yet, IMEDC hasn't applied for any permits or applications to begin the building process. If that is completed, there <br />will be future open forums for the residents to voice concerns and raise questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.