Laserfiche WebLink
CIP Work. session Meeting <br />January 15, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />After discussion, it was the unanimous consensus of the City Council to put <br />this issue on the January 22, 1006, City Council agenda for consideration <br />of awarding the WWTP expansion bids. <br /> <br />b. Egst Elk River Public Improvement Project <br /> <br />The City Administrator provided an overview of this project from its <br />conception in ] 080 fo the present. It was noted that the urban service <br />district for east Bk River has been established with the update of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and that starting in ] 096, the city would look at new <br />alternatives for a construction project and disregard the past options and <br />alternatives. '-, <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer presented and reviewed alternatives A, B, C, <br />and D. Discussion related to the direction of the trunk sanitary sewer <br />either being along Highway 10 or across Highway 169; the need to <br />establish one assessment rate Jplus COLA) for the entire east Elk River <br />project; and the difference between the city "pushing" the project to the <br />east versus a major developer "pulling" the project to the east. <br /> <br />Discussion at the Council level included a concern over how much of the <br />cost of the projecffhe city could hold on a temporary basis until it could <br />be assessed out to benefited properly owners...The Mayor indicated his <br />suppod for the approach of having the trunk sewer go across Highway <br />] 60 and also indicated his support fo hold a public hearing on the project <br />in order to receive property owner feedback on the proposaL.The <br />question was raised whether or not it would be appropriate to allow the <br />County Rood 12 area to develop in a residential nature prior to the east <br />Highway 10 area developing and if this is feasible...The maximum <br />assessment rate per acre was reviewed...A number of Councilmembers <br />indicated that the project should wait until it was developer driven. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to obtain a quote <br />for a complete appraisal for this project area from Patchin and <br />Associates. It was the consensus of the City Council to get a quote from <br />the City Engineer for the cost of doing topographical maps based on air <br />photography. The Council asked for a clarification on the status of the <br />assessment manual and the need for an update in order to ensure that <br />one assessment rate can be established for the whole east Elk River area. <br /> <br />.c. <br /> <br />~_eview of Current or Onqoinq Projects - The City Engineer reviewed his <br />i / ] 1/06 memo on the status of current projects. <br /> <br />d. Streets <br /> <br />185th Avenue or Hi,qhway 10 North Frontoqe Road Beqinninq at Joplin <br />St__.'ee___~t <br /> <br />The City Engineer reviewed the timetable for this proposed project. Sherri <br />Emerson, representing the guardian Angels Foundation, asked a number <br />of questions regarding development of the Guardian Angels property in <br /> <br /> <br />