My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. SR 04-11-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
04/11/1996 - SPECIAL
>
3.1. SR 04-11-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2003 8:02:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/11/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Department <br />Elk River City Hall <br />PO Box 490 <br />Elk River, MN. 55330 <br /> <br />Cheryl Becker <br />11452 197th Avenue NW <br />Elk River, MN. 55330 <br /> <br />Attention Debbie Kleckner and Planning Commission, <br /> I would like this information to be in the packet that <br /> goes to the Planning Commission prior to the M~rch 26, 1996 <br /> meeting concerning the M~nnards Project P96-1. Please address <br /> this at the meeting. I have to writa this because with my <br /> business and other obligations with my children I cannot always <br /> make it to the meeting. <br /> I was at the public hearing with the Council on March llth. <br /> My house is only 40 feet from where the Mast line of the project <br /> intersects my back property line. My home sits on the South <br /> side of 197th and only 30 feet from the back property line <br /> which is a common property line for the project. <br /> At the Council meeting on March llth it was decided: <br /> <br /> 1. The "trail corridor" be removed because there shouldn't <br /> be public walkways across backyards of residences and because <br /> of how close it was to my back door. <br /> <br /> 2. The 75 foot no-cut strip on the North end of the project <br /> was then decreased to 50 feet without knowledge to me or the <br /> Council of how close this puts the parking lot to my house. <br /> <br /> 3. The developer was able to decrease the footage of 25 feet <br /> to 10 feet from the no-cut strip to start his parking lot for <br /> this Outlot w_~ knowledge to the Council or me how much <br /> closer this put the parking to my house. <br /> <br />Therefore, a parking lot with cars and public will be only 90 <br />feet from my hous~ and only 50 feet from my back property line. <br />I am extremenly happy with the trail corridor being removed <br />but decreasing the no-cut strip and increasing his parking <br />lot puts the public right back only 90 feet from my house <br />and only 50 feet from my property line. The developer <br />· gained 40 feet on the north side of his Outlot B, and I still <br />~ave the public ~d now the outio~, ~uzidzng <br />~o~-~-~t an. , a~g closer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.