My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. SR 04-08-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
04/08/1996 - SPECIAL
>
5.4. SR 04-08-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:17 AM
Creation date
3/11/2003 7:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/8/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDA TIF Request Page 2 <br />March 11, 1996 <br /> <br />land acquisition and the site development components of the project. With <br />each manufacturing project, an economic development (ED) district is <br />established. <br /> <br />The ED districts are designed to last only a few years as each one of these <br />new districts results in either a loss of state aid or a local contribution to the <br />project. This local contribution option is new (1995 law) and one that the city <br />favors because it carries a lower overall cost to the city. The local option is 10 <br />percent of the annual tax increment and our source of funds would be the <br />EDA revenues that have been generated from the sale of the Industrial Park <br />lot to the School District. With this Marketech project, the local contribution <br />will be approximately $1,000 per year for the five year life of the district. <br />More detailed information on the finances of this project and the local <br />contribution should be available Monday evening. <br /> <br />Due to the fact that a local financial loss is part of all new TIF Districts, it <br />was the EDA and City Council consensus that they would evaluate new <br />projects on a case-by-case basis. Based on future job growth with Marketech, <br />the desire to have Marketech locate in the McChesney Industrial Park, the <br />fact that Marketech is not asking for a micro loan, and, the fact that city staff <br />beheves that this is the right location for this local business expansion, it is <br />recommended that this request should be supported by the City Council and <br />EDA. <br /> <br />On 3/7/96, the Assistant City Administrator Lori Johnson and I met with <br />Rich Duggan and Tom McNair from First National Bank to review this <br />project. Items discussed included an overview of the project, the city's strong <br />desire to do a pay-as-you-go project, and the city's support for business <br />retention and expansion. Additionally, I had a conversation with the county <br />commercial appraiser for Elk River on 3/7/96 to discuss this project. This <br />telephone conversation was important because the final market value drives <br />the maximum TIF amount available. <br /> <br />Our current TIF pohcy calls for a maximum TIF subsidy of 15 percent of the <br />project's finished value. In discussing all of the pros and cons of this project <br />and the city's support for this project, staff is recommending that the city <br />offer 17 percent of the finished project as the maximum TIF contribution. <br />Regardless if the contribution is 15 percent or 17 percent, the TIF increments <br />will still be collected for five years. The 15 to 17 percent increase is about an <br />extra $1,000 a year in available increment. The extra 2 percent maximum <br />TIF subsidy was discussed in order to encourage and support: this expansion <br />into McChesney Industrial Park, the pay-as-you-go approach, and the city's <br />strong commitment for business retention and growth. <br /> <br />This 17 percent request will need EDA and City Council approval. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.