Laserfiche WebLink
~:.,,' ' r ~ s. <br />~Act><on Alert <br />p~ <br />(~ iS 1 r' 7w.rP cX <br />~r~ I i :H.~, mcma <br />1 ~j <br />Tax-exempt status of bonds threatened <br />Gary Carlson and Andrea Atherton <br />On Mazch 15 Representative Ann <br />Rest (DFL-New Hope) introduced H.F. <br />1380, a bill that would eliminate the <br />state income tax exclusion for interest <br />on bonds issued by the state and local <br />governments in Minnesota. If enacted <br />this bill would significantly increase <br />local government borrowing costs <br />because investors would no longer be <br />able to exclude the interest income <br />from their state taxable income. <br />On behalf of cities across <br />Minnesota, contact your representa- <br />tive, senator, and the bill's authors <br />income exclusion. According to <br />public finance experts, the bill could <br />increase bond interest rates by a quarter <br />percent to three-quarters of a percent <br />(25 to 75 basis points). Second, the bill <br />would increase state income tax <br />collections. According to the state's <br />tax expenditure budget, state income <br />tax collections could increase by <br />approximately $50 million per year if <br />all state and local bonds were affected. <br />However, the income tax impact would <br />be much less in the first yeaz df <br />implementation because existing bands <br />would only be impacted if they aze <br />resold after July 1, 1995. <br />Tax increment hearings continue <br />C <br />Gary Carlson <br />Tuesday, March 21 was a busy day <br />for those interested in tax increment <br />financing. The Property Tax Division <br />of the House Tax Committee completed <br />testimony on H.F. 147, Representative <br />Dennis Ozment's (IR-Rosemount) TIF <br />reform bill. In addition, the committee <br />considered H.F. 824, Representative <br />Ann Rest's (DFL-New Hope) bill that <br />would require school approval for new <br />or modified tax increment districts. <br />The committee also discussed Repre- <br />sentative Ron Abrams's (IR- <br />Minnetonka) bill requiring state auditor <br />approval for tax increment districts. <br />Many city officials have testified <br />in opposition to provisions contained in <br />H.F. 147. Although the testimony has <br />been persuasive, the committee will <br />likely include some, if nowt aii of the <br />H.F. I47 provisions in the final House <br />omnibus tax bill. <br />Senate Developments <br />On Tuesday afternoon, the <br />Property Tax subcommittee of the <br />Senate Tax Committee considered S.F. <br />~re~~°~s ly <br />~ I t~'~-. 1~ e, <br />and voice your opposition to H,F. <br />1380. <br />The bill was co-authored by <br />Thomas Bakk (DFL-Cook), Edgar <br />Olson (DFL-Fosston), Don Ostrom <br />(DFL-St. Peter), and Jean Wagenius <br />(DFL-Minneapolis). The bill would <br />affect obligations issued or sold after <br />July I,1995, or obligations acquired by <br />a Minnesota taxpayer after July 1, <br />1995. <br />The bill would have two major <br />impacts. First, it would result in <br />significantly higher borrowing costs for <br />the state and local governments <br />because investors would not realize the <br />1282, a bill authored by Senator John <br />Hottinger (DFL-Mankato). The <br />Hottinger bill would create a tax <br />increment grant program and eliminate <br />the LGA/HACA penalty for all tax <br />increment districts. <br />The Hottinger bill is a distinct <br />departure from the legislation that has <br />been working its way through the <br />House. Instead of criticizing local <br />officialsand their decisions, Senator <br />Hottinger is deferring to theirjudge- <br />ments. Senator Hottinger has been a <br />constant suppotter of city issues <br />throughout his tenure in the Minnesota <br />Senate. <br />In his testimony in support of his <br />bill, Senator Hottinger outlined what he <br />perceives to be problems wi[h tax <br />increment financing. Under the current <br />system of penalties, he has seen a <br />continuous and growing stream of <br />legislative exemptions from the LGA/ <br />HACA penalty. This stream of <br />legislation, he concludes, can only <br />indicate that the system must be fixed. <br />The tax increment grant program <br />would allow the Department of Trade <br />and Economic Development to make <br />March 24, 1995 L the Cfi}ies $wL~et?r <br />grants to TIF projects that might not be <br />undertaken because of financial <br />considerations. The grants would be <br />available to cities that meet certain <br />eligibility guidelines such as low <br />family income, below average taxable <br />tax capacity, high unemployment, and a <br />demonstrated shortage of low to <br />moderate income housing. <br />Offering testimony and support <br />were Bill Bassett from Mankato, Blaine <br />Hill from Breckenridge, Rob <br />Wolfington from Rushford, Steve <br />Mielke from Hopkins, Matt Fulton. <br />from New Brighton, and Mayor Kelly <br />Ferber from Fergus Falls. <br />Immediately after the discussions <br />of the Hottinger bill, the committee <br />began discussion of the Senate com- <br />panion to the Representative Ozment <br />bill. That bill was authored by Senator <br />Gen Olson (IR-Minnetrista). The <br />committee did not have time to fully <br />consider the bill. <br />While neither bill received a final <br />vote, both will be laid over for further <br />consideration by either the subcommit- <br />tee or the full tax committee. ~ <br />Page 3 <br />