7.1. SR 10-20-2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

If the statute limits our liability to $1,200,000 per occurrence, why would the city purchase higher coverage limits than that? There are several different reasons why cities should strongly consider carrying higher limits of liability coverage. 1. The statutory tort limits either do not or may not apply to several types of claims. Some examples include: • Claims under federal civil rights laws. These include Section 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, etc. • Claims for tort liability that the city has assumed by contract. This occurs when a city agrees in a contract to defend and indemnify a private party. • Claims for actions in another state. This might occur in border cities that have mutual aid agreements with adjoining states, or when a city official attends a national conference or goes to Washington to lobby, etc. • Claims based on liquor sales. This mostly affects cities with municipal liquor stores, but it could also arise in connection with beer sales at a fire relief association fund-raiser, for example. • Claims based on a "taking" theory. Suits challenging land use regulations frequently include an "inverse condemnation" claim, alleging that the regulation amounts to a "taking" of the property. 2. LMCIT's primary liability coverage has annual limits on coverage for a few specific risks. The table on page 1 lists the liability risks to which aggregate coverage limits apply. If the city has a loss or claim in one of these areas, there might not be enough limits remaining to cover the city's full exposure if there is a second loss of the same sort during the year. Excess liability coverage gives the city additional protection against this risk as well. However there are a couple of important restrictions on how the excess coverage applies to risks that are subject to aggregate limits: • The excess coverage does not apply to three risks: failure to supply utilities; mold; and "limited pollution "claims if either the pollutant release or the damage is below ground or in a body of water; and • The excess coverage does not automatically apply to liquor liability unless the city specifically requests it. 2