My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 10-20-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2008
>
10-20-2008
>
7.1. SR 10-20-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2008 3:32:37 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 3:32:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/20/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
What's the effect of waiving the statutory limits if we have excess coverage? <br />If the city has $1 million of excess coverage and chooses to waive the statutory tort limits, the <br />claimants (whether it's one claimant or several) could then potentially recover up to $2.2 million in <br />damages in a single occurrence. If the city carries higher excess coverage limits, the potential <br />maximum recovery per occurrence is correspondingly higher. <br />Carrying excess coverage under the waiver option is a way to address an issue that some cities find <br />troubling: the case where many people are injured in a single occurrence caused by city negligence. <br />Suppose, for example, that a city vehicle negligently runs into a school bus full of kids, causing <br />multiple serious injuries. $1,200,000 divided 50 ways may not go far toward compensating for those <br />injuries. Excess coverage under the waiver option makes more funds available to compensate the <br />victims in that kind of situation. <br />The cost of the excess liability coverage is about 25% greater if the city waives the statutory tort <br />limits. The cost difference is proportionally greater than the cost difference at the primary level <br />because for a city that carries excess coverage, waiving the statutory tort limits increases both the per- <br />claimant exposure and the per-occurrence exposure. <br />If we waive the statutory tort liability limits, does it increase the risk that the city will <br />end up with liability that LMCIT doesn't cover? <br />No. The waiver form specifically says that the city is waiving the statutory tort liability limits only to <br />the extent of the city's coverage. <br />Of course, that's not to say that there is no risk that the city's liability could exceed its coverage <br />limits. We listed earlier a number of ways that could happen to any city. But the waiver doesn't <br />increase that risk. <br />Can we waive the statutory tort limits for the primary coverage but not for the excess <br />coverage? <br />No. If the city decides to waive the statutory tort limits, that waiver applies to the full extent of the <br />coverage limits the city has. The city cannot partially waive the statutory limits. <br />I'm confused. Is there a simple way to summarize the options? <br />It's not necessarily simple, but the table on the following page is a shorthand summary of what the <br />effect would be of the various coverage structure options in different circumstances. <br />I'm still confused. Who can I talk to? <br />Give us a call at the League office. Pete Tritz, Ann Gergen, Doug Gronli, or any of LMCIT's <br />property/casualty underwriters will be glad to talk with you. <br />Pete Tritz 2/08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.