09-15-2008 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i~ Cocci 1~utes ~~e ~ept~~l~er ~~, ?a~~ i4~a~rice ~usse~I, 975 Evans Cixcle - e~pxessed concerns over gee removal on dais property, ~a~re ~~illi~rns, ~~z7G ode rxeet -stated concerns over lover proper values because o~ tine gee removal and also over increased rxa'~c ~. ~ area. ~~aruarl~e ~~11d, z~z~5 arson Street - ~.d~cated sloe doesn't believe ~:ees si~ould be removed ors tlx~s pxope~rt~ sixzce texe axe so n~.n~~ o~.~ex available locations ~vi~l~in tl~e cif; i=or tl~e school to locate. Sloe .so e:~pressed concerns over additional cones ion tl~e a~:ea, ~a~ph ~on~ls, ~~6 ~,oo~.out 'lace - stated lie ~~•ould lave to see mox~ schools, just gat in tlxis location a lie would hate to see tl~e trees and i~il~~~a~r ~uf:'~er ren-zoved. ~.on ~aotte, ~~-7~ 4 ~I~ ~arze ~- is nor pleased trees ~vili be removed. f im ~Ias~~an~px ~9T9~ bode avenue -stated concerns aver traf-ze sta~in~ d~aC tl~e project ~~`ouid rnalie more sense elsetivl~ere. d ~You~quit, riverside ~opanies, applicant - .dicated this is ~. ca.~n~nexciall~ coned piece o~ property; and lie believes dais tv~.l be a food ~.t. ~e ~ot~d tlxe school appxoacl~ed tl~en~ re~a~:d tlx~s piece ofd prgper. ~Ie noted tl~ar tl~e irnpro~*ernencs ro ~ ~i~ ~~ve€~ue n-~a~- addzess the tla~'~zc issues. e e~pl~ined tl~e alteration ~ tl~e lots ttias in o~dex to ~rnaintax~~ a~vnersl~ip o~ tl~e private drive and so ail ai: tl~e ease~~nents and rnainCenanre remain intact. ~~ia~+or l~~~n~ closed die public laeaxit~. au€~rizrne~~~ber ~arbez questioned tl~e impact on tl~e ~ees.1~.C.r. Ba~:nl~art explained that 1~~: leas Foot seen a i:oxn~al site plan but it is his understaz~din drat r~~e gees on ou~.ot ~~ ~~ ~zot be i,~pacted ~vid~ this proposal but that substan~ial clearing 4vi~1 tale place on lot z. ~~e noted ri~at tl~e cif awned propext~ along the pond teat ~v~l not be iz~parted. i~~f~:. ~3eci~ noted floor sctbacl~s az~d buf'f=ex az'eas axe in place al.on tl~e poz~d tlxar ~vauld protect a n.L~Fnber o~ ~e ~.{ees. ~~Ia~xar ~n~in~ e~.plained ti~a~ ~l~e lot leas been ~c~ned cof~n~~ercial for a v~r~ long r,~ne and ~l~e residences axouzzd sl~uld have been a~~are that tl~e pri~-atel~~ owned con-~nercial lay could be developed at any time. ~ia~or ~.n~in~ stated sloe would be inte1•ested ire re~onin~ outlet w~ as residential. ~~i~r. ~ecl~ e~plaed chat t}~e gone change would require ~ f 5 vase and noted that ii: tine propert~~ is c~~aned to residen~.al tl~~ ounce could lase autl~oriC~; to include bu~~ers as a reclu~:e~~~enr. ~,fs. ~aungquist noted that he urzdersr~~nds tlxe conce~~ over lost ~:ees, e noted rl~at ~€ bu~~er o~ ~U f=eet from tl~e residential area to the ~asr is aiready~ in pare as a pre~rious condition.. ~~~~~SC~N B~ S~IPL F~' ~R ~TL~~'~' ~~ H~~LS~D~ C~~SS~~ SST, C. '0, ~' ~5~~9, ~' ~~~ ~D~~~~`~~N ~~1~~~'~~~: