Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br /> <br />6.4h. <br /> <br />whether there are other areas of the riverbank th~ <br />Hals indicate( that he has walked the riverbank <br /> <br />the rip rap in <br />Streef Superinh <br />whether this is <br />can be bid out <br /> <br />Dis~ <br />store site <br /> <br /> areas in which it is needed. Ma' <br />~dent look at the corner by Da~ <br /> critical area. The City <br /> th construction alternatives. <br /> <br />in need of rip rap? Phil <br />feels that the City is using <br />Duitsman suggested that the <br />Funeral Home and determine <br />suggested that the project <br /> <br />I U 0~ <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />northeast corner of <br />the City's interest in p <br />He indicated that this <br />indicated that he discu! <br />and asked the Council <br />for a liquor store site. <br /> <br />Klaers, indicat <br /> intersection <br /> th <br /> the <br /> <br />he met with the property owner of the <br />Highway 169 and 193rd Avenue regarding <br />for the Northbound Liquor Store site. <br />preferred site for the new Liquor Store. He <br />market price of the property with the owners <br />any concerns regarding paying this amount <br /> <br />7.1. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scheel <br />She indicated there <br />stated that location is <br />Duitsman stated that <br />discussed again in ab, <br />Manager discuss this <br /> <br />.Other Business <br /> <br />a <br />with th~ <br /> <br />why the City felt it must consider only this site. <br />options open to the City. Councilmember Farber <br />to the success of the liquor store. Mayor <br />is something that should be considered and <br />The Council requested that the Liquor Store <br />ouncil at a later date. <br /> <br />Enm <br /> <br />Councilmemb~ questioned wh her the Council would be interested <br />in making a d~ on the issue of devel, ~ers utilizing the pdvate engineering <br />services. Rec¢ '~siderafio.n of Resolution 89-1 continued at the last Council <br />meeting until 10/17/94. It was the consensus of the Council to make no decision <br />on this issue at this time. <br /> <br />Council Salary Increase <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman questioned whether the Council wanted to consider an increase <br />in the Council's salary for 1995. He noted that the last increase was in 1991. <br />Councilmembers Scheel and Farber felt that a raise in Council salary was <br />appropriate as the Council meets more now than in the past. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER FARBER MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 94-14, AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDING SECTION 202 OF THE CiTY CODE, SALARIES OF MAYOR AND <br />COUNCILMEMBERS TO INCREASE THE SALARY FOR MAYOR, VICE MAYOR AND <br />COUNCILMEMBER BY $75.00 PER MONTH. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br /> <br />