My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. SR 09-15-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2008
>
09-15-2008
>
5.5. SR 09-15-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2008 9:25:06 AM
Creation date
9/12/2008 9:25:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />...__. <br />ver <br />To Item Number <br />Ci Council 5.5. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Communi Develo ment Se tember 15, 2008 Jerem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Request by City of Elk River for a Land Use Amendment <br />Relating to East Co. Rd. 40, Case No. LU 08-01 -Public Reviewed by <br />Hearing <br />Action Requested <br />Approval of a land use amendment, removing the subject property from the urban services district and <br />placing it in the rural service district. <br />Summary <br />The subject property was included in the urban services (city water and sewer) in preparation for Liberty <br />Heights Estates. As part of that approval, a condition was included that should a preliminary plat fail to <br />be approved, the property would go back to its original rural designation. This action accomplishes that. <br />Planning Commission Discussion <br />The Planning Commission questioned the history of the project, and felt comfortable with the <br />amendment, noting its consistency with the original Council decision. <br />Public Comment <br />There were several comments made during the public hearing. Two residents noted that property values <br />of water/ sewer available land is higher than land outside of the boundary. Other comments received <br />related to the need to include properties to the south in urban services, and the need to provide <br />connection to properties to the west. <br />Attachments <br />• Staff report to Planning Commission dated September 10, 2008 <br />• Resolution <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />C:\Documents and Settings\jmiller\Local Settings\Tempoxary Internet Files\OLK3E\CC staff report 9-15-08.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.