My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 03-12-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
03/12/1996 - SPECIAL
>
5.1. SR 03-12-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:14 AM
Creation date
2/6/2003 3:15:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bill Zacarda, 13446 Ranch Road, read a letter from Mark Martin and asked that it <br />be entered into the official record of the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. <br />Zacarda stated he feels the east-west can'idor will indirectly affect the quality of <br />life of all the residents of Elk River. He felt the taxes will increase and there will be <br />more demand for services. <br /> <br />Dick Hinkle, 13432 N~eadowvale Road, expressed concern for the City taking over <br />county roads due to cost for taxpayers. He stressed the importance of <br />government and residents showing respect for each other, as well as for property. <br />He felt enforcement of speed limits would help control the problem with gravel <br />trucks. He suggested that there could be an agreement with the gravel <br />companies to only run empty gravel trucks on County Road 32, such as there was <br />for Proctor. Mr. Hinkle stated that in approximately 1~270, MnDOT did a study to <br />skirt Elk River which would have cut through the back of his property, where 193rd <br />is now, along the railroad tracks and into to Big Lake. Mn/DOT backed away <br />because of the costs and decided to stick to the present system. Mr. Hinkle also <br />explained that the previous owners of the Woodland Trails Park land sold the <br />property to the City below market value, with the understanding that it would be <br />used as a park. He felt the character of the property would be ruined if a road <br />were put through between the park and golf course. Also, he did not want to see <br />the pond at County Road 1 and 32 destroyed. Mr. Hinkle stressed that in striving <br />for utopia, people must show respect for each other and for the land. Mr. Hinkle <br />concluded by saying he was proud of Elk River, the school system, and most of all, <br />of its people. <br /> <br />Robin Turtle, 13324 Ranch Road, submitted a petition with 3~21 signatures in <br />opposition of the proposed east-west corridor. <br /> <br />Arne Engstrom, 20800 Meadowvale Road, read the letter from Dave Schwarting, <br />Sherburne County Highway Engineer, in its entirety. He asked the Planning <br />Commission to consider the affect of the east-west corddor on the quality of life in <br />Elk River. <br /> <br />There being no further comments from the public, Chair Dillon closed the public <br />heating (8:30 p.m.). <br /> <br />Terry Maurer provided the following responses to comments and questions raised <br />during the public hearing: <br /> <br />What are the costs for the proposed roads.8 <br />Since the transportation study is for "future" roads, it is difficult to estimate costs at <br />this time. The roads may not be built for some time and costs could change <br />considerably. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.