Laserfiche WebLink
Op Ed on the Northstar Commuter Line <br /> <br />Commuter Rail is the Right Way to Go <br /> <br />Paul M. Weyrich <br /> <br />The Twin Cities are now poised to begin commuter rail service with the Northstar Commuter <br />Line, serving communities in the fast-growing area between Minneapolis-St. Paul and St. Cloud. <br />As a political conservative, I am opposed to commuter rail transit. Right? Wrong! As a <br />conservative who knows something about public transit, I realize that rail transit is the right way <br />to go. <br /> <br />All transit is not created equal. In fact, there are two very different kinds of public transit, with <br />different purposes, different markets and different technologies. <br /> <br />The first is urban transit designed to serve the transit dependent, people who have no car or do <br />not drive. The purpose of this kind of transit is to provide basic mobility to people who <br />otherwise could not get around. In particular, it enables these people to get to work. That makes <br />it of special interest to conservatives who want to see people work rather then collect welfare. If <br />the poor are to better themselves by holding jobs, they have to be able to get to those jobs. <br /> <br />In most cases, the best technology for serving the transit dependent is the bus. Buses can provide <br />frequent service on a wide grid of city streets. Because the transit dependent have to walk from <br />their homes to transit, they need transit service that runs on nearby streets. Buses do that well <br />enough, although streetcars did it better. <br /> <br />But that is only one type of public transit. There is a very different type of transit, designed not <br />for the transit dependent but for people who now drive - and who are driving in such number <br />that our highways are clogged. Here is where commuter rail comes in. <br /> <br />These "riders from choice," as they are usually called, will only use transit if it is of high quality. <br />It has to offer them transit service that is better than driving their own car. That means service <br />that is fast over long distances, reliable (including in winter weather), and comfortable - more <br />comfortable than the bus. They want plugs for their laptop computers, a seatback tray they can <br />work on, a place for their bagel and cup of latte. A commuter train offers all of these things. <br />And when commuter trains are available, middle and upper-middle class people will leave their <br />cars at home or in the park-and-ride lot and ride the train. That reduces highway congestion for <br />everyone, including the people who still drive. <br /> <br />A look at Chicago's excellent Metra commuter train system shows what commuter rail can bring <br />to the Twin Cities. Metra carries more than 20% of all commuting trips into the Chicago Central <br />Business District. More than 85% of Metra's riders have a car available, but choose to take the <br />train instead. 25% have household incomes over $100,000. In fact, if we look at commuters into <br />Chicago from Lake county, we find that train riders had mean earnings of more than $76,000, <br />compared to less than $14,000 for bus riders, and that the earnings of rail commuters were more <br />than double those of people driving to work alone. <br /> <br /> <br />