My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. SR 04-16-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
04/16/2001
>
4.2. SR 04-16-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:13 AM
Creation date
2/5/2003 8:39:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/16/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR-1Z-01 IO:ZSAM FROkl-.ELK RIVER UTILITIES 612441609g T-86T P.02/05 F-glO <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />April 10, 2001 <br /> <br />5.1 Undate Mechanics Position <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams reviewed the issue of an equipment and vehicle mechanic. The issue of' <br />contracting with the City,~ when they re-organize the City Garage to add additional bays, and hire <br />another mechanic was discussed. Bryan Adams and Glenn Sundeen presented their viewpoints, <br />adding the reasons that they feel a Utility mechanic position, with an equipment repair bay added to <br />the proposed Utility Garage would be advantageous. Michael Price responded with comments <br />about the need for maintenance and repair of the Plant ]~ngines. John Dietz is concerned that <br />adding a Utility mechanic would be duplicating expenses. Glenn Sundeen was asked if he could <br />prepare a maintenance schedule to coordinate with the City. The amount of work that would have <br />to be done outside the City or Utility was discussed. James Tralle agreed with John Dietz that <br />sharing the task should be tested for a period of time. Staff again mentioned the critical need for <br />plant engine maintenance and operation. <br /> <br /> George Zabee moved to use the City Operation for maintenance and repair, at the time they <br />re-organize their garage and hire a new mechanic, for a period of nine months to a year. James <br />Tralle seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> <br />6.2 Review Wage Re~_uest from ERMU Emnlovees <br /> <br /> Art Gatchell, Mark Fuchs, Wade Lovelette, and Michael Price appeared on behalf of the <br />operational employees, with a request for a 4.44% wage increase, to keep up with metro average <br />pay scale. It was noted that the 4.44% increase average was for linemen only. Bryan Adams asked <br />the Commission to be aware of the competition for lineman among electric utilities, difficulty of <br />hiring good employees, and the need to keep trained qualified people in the organization. <br /> <br /> James Tralle agreed that point is important. George Zabee noted he would prefer to use a <br />median, rather than the mean average, but will not do that for this year. Mr. Zabee further observed <br />that a select group is used for comparisons. Bryan Adams noted that the groups used are <br />eomparables of the Utilities and is ER.MU competition for employees. Michael Price advised that <br />because of the increase in costs to the employees for certain benefits, some employees have not <br />recognized a pay increase. <br /> <br /> James Tralle moved to increase the pay of the Operations people 4.44%. George Zabee <br />seconded the motion. Motion was further discussed before voting. Motion failed 1-2, George <br />Zabee and John Dietz voting nae. <br /> <br /> George Zabee moved to increase the pay of the Linemen 4.44%. James Tralle seconded. <br />Motion carried 2-1. John Dietz voting nae. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.