Laserfiche WebLink
-PAS QuickNotes <br />Form-Based Zoning <br />A list Of references at the end of this OtsickNote will pmvideyou with additional readings aboxt Form-Ba.ced Zoning. <br />Please contactyourPAS Representative for available reference material: <br />THE PRINCIPAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FORM-BASED AND TRADITIONAL <br />ZONING <br />Prescriptive, contextual standards. Traditional zoning prn.rcribes minimum setbacks, permitting <br />building placement anywhere within the allowable zone. Form-based zoning prescribes build-to lines, <br />specifically defining desired development patterns. Based on ideal urban forms or contextual cues, <br />form-based zoning ensures that new development will be appropriate to community vision or <br />existing character. <br />Encouraging Mixed-Use. By rigidly focusing on land use, traditional zoning makes mixed-use <br />development difficult, if not impossible. Form-based zoning de-emphasizes land-use regulation, <br />allowing the market to determine the use. For example, form-based regulation would prescribe large <br />windows and entrances oriented toward the street to promote ground-floor retail. Form-based <br />zoning encourages a healthy mix of retail and residential uses, and aims to curb sprawl ar.:i reduce <br />car dependence by removing elements of the zoning code that encourage exclusionary housing <br />practices and density restrictions. <br />Adapting to the Market, By prescribing use, traditional zoning attempts to predict demand. Uses <br />that are no longer threats to public health are still segregated (e.g., office and light industrial from <br />residential uses). Residential zoning regulations adopted when household size was on the rise cannot <br />adapt to modern needs of empty nesters and young, childless professionals without extensive <br />revision. Form-based zoning restores use determination to the market, allowing the use to <br />automatically adapt to demographic and market shifts. Some designers of form-based codes find <br />that, in the early stages of adoption, prescribing a mix of uses may be necessary to wean developers <br />from the ingrained practice of segregating uses. Freeing the real estate market to respond to changes <br />in demand has been shown to increase property values. Regionally, improving the quality of life <br />through form-based zoning may lead to a competitive advantage in attracting a talented labor force. <br />COMPONENTS OF THE FORM-BASED APPROACH <br />The Regulating Plan. The regulating plan illustrates where form-based codes apply and guides <br />developers to implement them properly. It classifies sites according to street, block, and district <br />characteristics and includes easy-to-follow illustrations of build-to lines, projected building <br />footprints, location of public spaces, and allowable building types specific for each site. Developers <br />and planners view the site as part of a larger, unified design. Unlike traditional zoning maps, which <br />provide little information about vacant land, regulating plans provide a vision of future <br />development. <br />Building Envelope Standards. Building envelope standards ensure that development fits the <br />desired character of the zone, regulating building height, placement, and orientation. The standards <br />prescribe the ideal. For example, height parameters define the minimum height needed to define the <br />